October 7, 2008
Random thoughts about the Angels' playoff ouster in Boston
I have a lot of disjointed, random thoughts after the Angels were eliminated from the playoffs on Monday night. Here they are:
- There are many, including myself, who will say that this 2008 season is a disappointment because the Angels did not make it to the World Series. Still, I appreciate that for the Angels, the World Series is a goal and not a pipe dream. This team will compete again next year.
- Also, I, like a lot of Angels players, did not feel the Red Sox were as talented as the Halos. The Angels beat themselves, rather than letting the Red Sox beat them. The silver lining, if there is one from this series, is that the Halos made all four games competitive unlike in 2007; if a ball had bounced this way or that way - or if a bunt had been placed correctly - it could have been the Angels advancing.
- The squeeze play. There have been thousands upon thousands of words written about Angel Manager Mike Scioscia electing to have Erick Aybar bunt to bring Reggie Willits home in the top of the ninth. Aybar missed the bunt and Willits was tagged out at third.
I would have preferred Aybar swing away and try to get a hit or a pop fly to drive Willits in. Even if Aybar had failed, Figgins would then have had a chance to drive Willits home. I can only assume that Scioscia, knowing the Angels were struggling with runners in scoring position, wanted to force the issue. We can all second guess and Monday-morning quarterback Scioscia but if the play had been successful, we would be commending him. Live by the bunt, die by the bunt.
- I think the two key things that separated the Angels from the Red Sox this series were defense and hitting. The Angels played terrible defense throughout the series whereas the Red Sox played solid defense. Meanwhile, the Angels struggled all series long driving runners home in scoring position whereas the Red Sox did just enough of that to eke by. Plus the Angels did not start getting extra base hits until Game 3!!!
Scioscia has said that the Angels are built around pitching and defense. Unfortunately, only the pitching showed up this series.
- Is it time to adjust the ways the Angels play baseball? Understand, we are not fans of the Billy Beane "Moneyball" statistics-driven type of analysis that Rob Neyer has an orgasm over. However, the Red Sox have adopted some of those Moneyball standards and incorporated some speed into the lineup with the likes of Jacoby Ellsbury.
Do I think the Angels need to become like the Red Sox? Hell, no. I would be sickened if Angels batters reacted the way guys like David Ortiz and Kevin Youkilis do when they get a called strike or a called third strike. Ortiz and Youkilis react like you said something about their mother whenever they get a called strike.
But the Angels do need to install some sense of patience into their lineup. Too often, Angels hitters were swinging at the first pitch - even if it was out of the strike zone. In some cases, the Angels hitters swung at the first, second and third pitch too - and here we are specifically referring to Howie Kendrick. And this all leads to......
- My friend suggested this one: Do the Angels need to release/fire/ask to step aside hitting coach Mickey Hatcher?
In 2005, 2007 and 2008, the Angels offense has disappeared in the postseason - along with the extra base hits.
Here's some staggering numbers - in 2002, the Angels were fourth in the American League in runs scored. But in recent playoff years and non-playoff years, the Halos' rank in the American League in runs scored has been pitiful.
In 2004 and 2005, the Halos were seventh in the league in runs scored. In 2007, the Angels again were fourth in the league in runs. However, this year the Angels were tenth(!) in the American League in runs scored.
And while both Torii Hunter and Mark Texieira were brought in to give some power to the Angels lineup, they did not hit any home runs nor did Vladimir Guerrero in the four-game series.
And Howie Kendrick seemed to swing at everything.
Maybe the Angels need to bring in a new hitting coach - one who is able to work with the Angels' young hitters and counsel them on how to take a few pitches. However, a new hitting coach would also need to be able to work with hitters to coach them on how to hit and run and work with runners on base.
I don't like to write that so-and-so should be fired and/or released but at this point don't Angels fans have to point at the offense as holding the team back? If you let Hatcher go and brought someone else in, couldn't the new hitting coach do at least a little bit better with the hitters?
- Speaking of letting people go: Here is my list of free agent Angels who should be kept and should be let go:
Francisco Rodriguez - Let him go. That J.D. Drew home run was Frankie's last dance at Angel Stadium. Let another team overpay him and let him save 70 games; he has been hittable all year.
Garret Anderson - Let him go. While I would like to see Garret Anderson stay and finish his career with the Angels, I don't see it happening. He would have to settle for a salary of $3 million to $5 million to stay with the Angels and I think he thinks he could get more elsewhere. Also despite his second-half surges in back-to-back years, GA is getting older.
Mark Teixeira - Keep him. Of course, I don't think the Angels will be able to keep him. Since he is a Scott Boras client, Tex will be asking for an eight to 10-year contract and Arte Moreno's first born child. Tex will also be seeking about $20 million or year a more and I don't believe that Moreno is willing to shell out that dough.
Vladimir Guerrero - Keep him. The Halos have a club option for 2009 for Vladdy but the thought is they will offer him an extension. Will he be satisfied if it is not as much as Torii Hunter received? By the way, Vlad still has only driven in one run now in about the last 80 postseason at bats.
John Lackey - Keep him. Like Vlad, Lackey has an option for 2009 but he made some cryptic comments to the L.A. Times about waiting to see what the Angels will do in the offseason offense-wise before he re-ups. But you have to keep Lackey; he kept the Halos in both games 1 and 4.
Jon Garland - Let him go. Thanks for the innings but not the memories, Jon.
Juan Rivera - Keep him. Again, if the Halos can get Rivera to stay, he provides some decent pop off of the bench and is a better offensive player than Gary Matthews, Jr. But again it depends on how much money Rivera is seeking; he might also take less and go somewhere where he can be a full-time player.
- That's about it for my postseason wrap-up. Again, the postseason was far too short for the Angels and their fans.
The good news is spring training begins in about 130 to 140 days. I will see you all in Tempe!
Discussion
8 Comments on "Random thoughts about the Angels' playoff ouster in Boston"
#1
Posted by Rob McMillin, October 7, 2008 11:11 PM
It is not entirely up to the Angels as to whether Lackey will be kept. As Bill Shaikin wrote in yesterday's editions of the Times, he is waiting to see what they do with the offense.
The Angels yap endlessly about RISP2 hitting and other stuff that is essentially voodoo. OBP and power are the keys to a successful offense. Everything else is garbage.
#2
Posted by Rob McMillin, October 7, 2008 11:14 PM
Also, and finally: my rant about why Mickey Hatcher needs to be fired. Not because he doesn't intrinsically know what needs to be done, but because the organization needs a top to bottom revamp around power and OBP. The organizational self-fulfilling prophesy that says the Angels can't develop young players with these skills is just soul-destroying.
#3
Posted by xyz, October 8, 2008 3:32 AM
"Understand, we are not fans of the Billy Beane “Moneyball” statistics-driven type of analysis that Rob Neyer has an orgasm over."
Either you haven't read Moneyball or you did but didn't understand it. Moneyball is about taking advantage of market inefficiencies.
#4
Posted by Joe Florkowski, October 8, 2008 9:01 AM
Taking advantage of market inefficiencies?! When did baseball become economics???
But I guess maybe it has.... maybe we should ask guys like Billy Beane and Theo Epstein to solve this financial crisis the U.S. economy is currently having! They would get the job done for sure!!
#5
Posted by ptp, October 8, 2008 4:01 PM
I like the Angels chances for next year if they make wise decisions. The problem is that I like the chances for next year every year around this time. The difference is that I see the players starting to place blame/make excuses...Lackey and Hunter's comments about the Red Sox being an inferior team may be correct when you look at the entire season--but not in the playoffs. Show some class and take the loss for what it is--a loss. Losing the first 2 games at home is what lost the series. Scoreboard does not lie--no matter what anyone believes-the Red Sox are the better team because they play on while the Angels play golf. The red sox seem to be the model franchise for melding large payroll, with farm grown youth. Maybe the halos should take a lesson.
#6
Posted by Shane, October 9, 2008 7:19 AM
As long as tickets are sold and players have salaries creating a team will be economics. Owners and FA are a market, pure and simple, and Moneyball is about getting the most bang for your buck..
#7
Posted by Joe Florkowski, October 9, 2008 8:42 AM
PTP, if indeed that is your real name,
The Angels do meld a large payroll with farm-system depth; four of their five starters are homegrown pitchers. The middle infielders, catchers and left fielder are farm-grown depth. In fact, I would argue that the Angels are more successful because of that development of farm system talent rather than the free agents they have acquired.
#8
Posted by Jock Thompson, October 9, 2008 2:20 PM
The Angels offensive approach with runners in scoring position was deplorable. Consider these series numbers: Fifteen times with RISP, Angel hitters swung at the first pitch and five more times they swung at the second pitch in an AB without seeing Strike One. In all 20 of these instances, they came up empty. Ten of them resulted in outs, with Teixeira's sac fly in Game 2 the only RBI. Torii Hunter is being credited for going 5-for-11 with RISP, but he was up with RISP in the majority of his ABs. He did more first-pitch hacking than any Angel, and stranded 12 baserunners, second only Kendrick.
I didn't check the video, but I'm guessing Red Sox pitchers are aware of Angel hitter tendencies, and weren't exactly throwing the ball down the middle. There's never been much of a penalty exacted for not throwing strikes to Angel hitters.
On a related but non-postseason note, Casey Kotchman turned into an unbelieveable hacker from May through July this year, seemingly without check, after being good-to-excellent from a patience standpoint throughout his career. Ditto Juan Rivera after becoming a starter in the second half, as well as in the playoffs.
There's something in the Angel offensive scheme that needs adjusting.
















Leave a comment