November 9, 2008

Wallace for Curry? No, no, a thousand times no

The day after the Bobcats drew a measure of respect in beating the New Orleans Prodigals 92-89 with a thrilling fourth quarter run, the Observer ran a little sidebar story discussing the possibility of trading Gerald Wallace.

This in and of itself is no crime. Indeed, I have also discussed the possibility (and the relative inevitablity) of Crash being out of the Queen City by the All Star break. SO I read with interest until I hit this little gem:

One rumor circulating the country would have Wallace heading to Golden State, Warriors forward Al Harrington joining the New York Knicks and Eddy Curry leaving New York for the Bobcats.
Let me give you that again, in case you missed it.

One rumor circulating the country would have Wallace heading to Golden State, Warriors forward Al Harrington joining the New York Knicks and Eddy Curry leaving New York for the Bobcats.
To paraphrase a failed presidential candidate; my friends, this would be a travesty of monumental proportions. My friends.

Let me get to the core of this quickly: Eddy Curry is a buster. If you think Nazr Mohammed doesn't work hard on the boards, I beg you to look at any recording of Curry playing basketball at any level you can find. Eddy Curry only gets rebounds that come directly to him, and only then if he can't get out of the way.

Here's the source of my ire. Back when Eddy Curry and Tyson Chandler were getting ready to go into the NBA, they were the next Kevin Garnett and Shaqulle O'Neal! They were unstoppable forces of Nature! They would bring a TITLE to WHATEVER FRANCHISE would DRAFT THEM! So the Chicago Bulls did just that. They traded 20-10 guy Elton Brand (let that sink in: Elton Brand) to the Clippers for the draft rights to Chandler, and drafted Curry with their own pick.

And the franchise has never been the same.

The Bulls cratered as the "Baby Bulls" never came close to their potential. Chandler can't shoot; tough to be a Garnett clone if you cant stroke it. His greatest success has been as a recipient of lob passes from Chris Paul. And Curry...where do I start? Where he started I guess; in high school, Eddy Curry, a 6' 11" 300 pound man child, did not average 10 rebounds a game.

You read that right. The largest player in the state of Illinois, let alone the city of Chicago, could not average more than 9.7 rebounds a game. Look, at his size, 6 should hit him in the head. He simply did not try. And after he became a pro, all the talk was about how Curry was "unmotivated," and "seems not to care."

Duh.

Curry is a talented low post scorer. Period. He can't rebound, he can't defend, he can't pass, and he doesn't work. How long would it be before Larry Brown went all Hannibal Lechter on him and left him hanging from the rafters at The Cable Box, entrails arrayed like an angel's wings? Before Charlotte discovers what New York and Chicago found out before them; that Eddy Curry is a buster, a tease, a South Side YMCA player masquerading as an NBA baller?

For all that is good and right in this world, please. Larry, Michael, Rod. Don't do this. I know you need a big guy, a low post scorer. Not Eddy Curry. Not now, not ever. This is what the ESPN Trade Machine is for. If you want to do salary comparisons for something that works, look there. But every single time you do it, you must leave Eddy Curry out of the discussion. I'm begging you.
Tags: Charlotte Bobcats, Chris Paul, Eddy Curry, Elton Brand, Gerald Wallace, Larry Brown, Michael Jordan, Nazr Mohammed, Rod Higgins, Tyson Chandler

Discussion

9 Comments on "Wallace for Curry? No, no, a thousand times no"

#1

user-pic

Posted by Amar Panchmatia, November 10, 2008 10:39 PM

I agree...Curry is a waste. This move sets the Bobcats back another three years, maybe more...as if they can afford that at this time.

Wallace and Morrison for Szczerbiak's $13M expiring contract, Delonte West, and two first-round picks. Deal?

Reply

#2

user-pic

Posted by Ed Ziti, November 11, 2008 3:22 PM

The problem is, there are only a handful of guys in the NBA that can consistently score down low. In defense of Eddy Curry, he hasn't been used the way he should have been. Eddy Curry should be used the way Indiana used Rik Smits. Depend on him to score 15 points at point blank range, and understand that he's not a dominant rebounder or shot blocker. He could score 15 points, while playing 20 minutes if he got enough touches. That in itself, could help the Bobcats win some games.

Now I like Gerald Wallace, and think giving him up is too much, but know for a fact that Eddy Curry can score down low in this league and few others can. Many people say Curry is a waste and this and that, but the problem is he's never lived up to to what have been very high expectations. Make believe he's a second round pick and you wouold love this guy.

Reply

#3

user-pic

Posted by George Washington III, November 11, 2008 7:52 PM

Ed, I see your point, and you're right. Low post scoring talent is at a premium. And yes, if there was some way to treat him like the Dutch Boy in the Paint, I'd be all for it.

But...and this is a huge but...Smits made an effort to do a little more elsewhere. And because he was a jumpshooter, the ball didn't tend to go inside to him and completely disappear. He also was never the turnover machine that Curry has turned out to be...'06-'07, Curry played 81 games and turned it over 295 times.

If his isn't scoring, he isn't doing anything.

Reply

#4

user-pic

Posted by Josh, November 12, 2008 8:17 AM

I think I can see where the 'Cats are going with this. Clearly, LB plans on playing Curry and Sean May together, and then slathering the ball in chocolate frosting. Trust me, you'll see some rebounds!

Reply

#5

user-pic

Posted by Ed Ziti, November 12, 2008 2:34 PM

About all LB will do is lose 65 games and get you guys a top 3 pick. That's his value to your franchise. The dude ruins franchises. Maybe you should slather the ball in bullshit, and let the fans take a bite out of it.

Reply

#6

user-pic

Posted by Zach Harper, November 12, 2008 3:00 PM

Is that premium scoring of Curry valuable when he gives up just as many points if not more? I fail to see the value of a big man that can't defend and can't rebound.

Reply

#7

user-pic

Posted by George Washington III in reply to comment from Zach Harper, November 12, 2008 4:27 PM

That's my point...Curry's scoring input doesn't come close to balancing out his many deficiencies. And since many have tried and failed to get him to elevate his game, it's not worth the effort.

Reply

#8

user-pic

Posted by George Washington III in reply to comment from Ed Ziti, November 12, 2008 4:38 PM

Wow.

Here's what I say: if ruining your franchise includes getting them into the playoffs (Clippers, Spurs), to the conference finals (Pacers) to the Finals (Sixers), and winning an NBA championship (Pistons)...then ruin my franchise, please.

I am aware of Larry Brown's many shortcomings, just as I am aware of all Internet traditions (http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2008/06/thanks-to-911-shes-outraged-by.html#583745). But you know, this franchise may just need to be gutted to get something going in this city. I'm willing to take that chance.

Reply

#9

user-pic

Posted by Ed Ziti, November 12, 2008 6:35 PM

Look more recently at Larry's Olympic and New York Knick stints. At one time, he was the best coach in the NBA, the one that could turn around any franchise. Since he won his title with Detroit, it's been downhill and the slope keeps getting slippier every day. The key to coaching is communication and the ability to get the players to do what you want them to do. Larry knows what needs to be done, but can't get the players to do it. I believe the game has passed him by. Everytime the team wins, it's because of Larry and when they lose it's because of the players. You'll see...

Reply

Leave a comment