December 22, 2008

CHIEFS BLAME GAME: CULPRIT #1 - Carl Peterson (Part 1 of 2)

Kansas City Chiefs v Denver Broncos
When things go wrong, the blame for those problems usually starts from up-top. That's especially true in Kansas City. Carl Peterson decimated this team through poor decisions from 1999-2005 that led to a roster of aging veterans and poor free agent transplants with few notable draft picks to replace them. That spelled a recipe for disaster well before Herm Edwards ever entered the picture in Kansas City. Peterson made the situation even worse by refusing to rebuild, so instead he essentially placed a wet band-aid on a leaky faucet.
It was only a matter of time before the roster imploded. The aging players retired, the cap space disappeared, and the young players with promise were nowhere to be found.

As I referenced in an earlier column, what led to Peterson's recent demise was that he became too comfortable in Kansas City. Lamar Hunt gave him free reign to do whatever he wanted, so Peterson did what a lot of us would have done: he revolved the entire organization around people he trusted and relied exclusively on people within his internal network. As Peterson became more powerful, he began to close his networks off. His last three head coach hires were all from his personal network. That's fine, but what makes the story more compelling is that he didn't even bother to look outside of that network. When Herm Edwards was hired, he didn't bother going through the interview process. He didn't bother interviewing Eric Mangini or Sean Payton. Not to say he would have hired either of them, but it is intriguing that he didn't at least look. Arguably, a similar but less powerful argument applies to his re-hiring of Gunther Cunningham and Mike Solari as Herm Edwards' assistants. Yes, Gun and Solari were two coordinators Herm Edwards targeted in New York, but once again, these guys were hired without even looking outside the organization. Remember when Greg Robinson "resigned" as defensive coordinator? Think back to who Carl Peterson looked at to be Robinson's replacement: Joe Vitt, Peter Guinta, and Gunther Cunningham. That's right--two of those candidates were part of Robinson's staff. Outrageous, right? But it was this extreme loyalty to his croneys that largely led to the demise of the Chiefs. Let's go a step further.

Mistake #1: The Lynn Stiles Gift That Kept on Giving
I earmarked Lynn Stiles as culprit #2 for the Chiefs' current problems and I'll discuss him in more depth in a few days. The reason he isn't #1 is that Stiles was a Peterson hire and it was probably largely Peterson who allowed his incompetence to slide. Stiles was a complete failure in Kansas City and it was his lousy personnel decisions that decimated the Chiefs' roster. Yet, he was allowed to conduct failed drafts from 2001-2005 before Peterson ever did anything about it. Peterson's reaction to Stiles' incompetence was like watching a videotape of trainwreck in super-slow motion.

That builds the case against Carl Peterson and you can see how he has had such a resoundingly negative impact on the Chiefs in recent years. It was his loyalty to his friends like Vermeil, Herm, and Stiles that probably kept the Chiefs from making it over the top:
Just think of how much better this team would have been if just TWO more defensive free agents or draft picks ended up being solid starters between 1999-2005. It was his loyalty to his network of friends that led to a limited search for new coach hires.

Tomorrow, I'll go into even greater depth about Peterson's recent mistakes that led to the Chiefs' recent downslide.


Tags: Carl Peterson, Clark Hunt, Herm Edwards, Kansas City Chiefs, Lynn Stiles, NFL

Discussion

6 Comments on "CHIEFS BLAME GAME: CULPRIT #1 - Carl Peterson (Part 1 of 2)"

#1

user-pic

Posted by Big Lee, December 23, 2008 3:16 PM

Any organization that continues to hire from within will become somewhat in-bred. You need to have at least some guys that will bring in new perspectives.

There needs to be some comment on Whitlock's piece about Dorsey. Why would you line a short guy head up on the guard? That is an easy block. But you have to wonder why you drafted this guy (and gave him millions) if he physically cannot do what you need him to do. Whitlock wanted him in the gap. Also wonder if he might be successful head-up on the center.

Also, I made a similar post yesterday that didn't show up. Are all of the bugs out since you made changes on this website?

Reply

#2

user-pic

Posted by Eric Rosa, December 23, 2008 10:22 PM

Typically, the site will send a request to either the original poster or someone here (as far as I know) to approve the comment. That way, we aren't posting spam / other unsavory junk to the comments section.

As far as commenting on Whitlock's piece, I just wrote a piece on Dorsey. It's hard for me to disagree with Whitlock's assessment, though I disagree that he's been under performing (#1 rookie DL in tackles in the NFL right now). I'd do a post, but I don't want to rehash a post I just did a little over a week ago.

Reply

#3

user-pic

Posted by Big Lee, December 24, 2008 1:14 AM

I agree with you, Eric, it's too early to judge Dorsey. I guess my point is are the Chiefs using him correctly? That might alter his development.

Reply

#4

user-pic

Posted by Jon Y, December 24, 2008 6:33 AM

Big Lee, it doesn't surprise me that the Chiefs misused Dorsey. It's been a recurring theme during Gunther Cunningham's tenure in KC. I knew that when Alfonso Boone was moved to DE, I had had MORE than enough with Gun.

I also can't wait for the Chiefs to be rid of Krumrie. It seems like he only teaches the linemen that the only move they can make is to bullrush. I've never seen much progression from any of these guys in terms of developing pass rush moves.

Reply

#5

user-pic

Posted by Big Lee, December 24, 2008 1:54 PM

I'm beginning to come around to the perspective that Chiefs need to clean house. Herm did the right thing this year by purging old guys, but I'm not sure current staff knows how to handle new ones.

We've got to get so many decisions right. Stay with spread and Thiggy, or bring in a vet at QB (Donovan McNabb? Mortenson seems to think they may kick him to the curb, ala Pennington)? Who do we keep in front 7 of defense, and who/what do we need to pick up(there's too much invested there to just start over, which will lengthen rebuilding job)? Left side of o-line looks good, but does right side need help? Where does Larry Johnson fit in?

Is KC next year's Miami, or should we keep our sights set on down the road? Can SD and Denver be as bad next year as they are this year (Raiders will be)?

Reply

#6

user-pic

Posted by UCrawford, December 24, 2008 6:08 PM

What happened to Part 2?

Reply

Leave a comment