How ’bout some more science, Melvin?
Bob Melvin. Let’s be honest, man, I think you’ve taken this ‘mad scientist’ thing a little too far. It’s not all cackling madly and throwing switches while Igor takes cover from a shower of sparks. Don’t get me wrong, you’ve got the “mad” part down to a T, perfectly. But there’s that little niggling factor you’re missing out on- the science part.
Yeah, I know, you made quite an impact last year, and I was all for it- you deserved that Manager of the Year award, no doubt. But this year? It’s not quite working out. Like I said, too much mad, not enough scientist. You might wonder why I bring it up now, so I’ll cut straight to it- Micah Owings.
The guy had a great season at the plate last year- we all remember that, it was fantastic. The Babe Ruth comparisons ran amok, he earned a Silver Slugger, and we all leaned back to wonder what it’d be like if he hit more often. Okay, that’s fine, we’re all together there. I don’t think anyone really could argue much at the idea of trying him out as a pinch hitter during the season- who wouldn’t want that bat in the lineup more often?
But remember when I said you had too much mad, not enough science? This is just where science might help. The scientific method, as many of us were taught at the surly age of 14 is all about gathering data and using it to understand at the bigger picture. So let’s look at the data here. Counting today’s outing, Micah’s had 12 pinch hit appearances. In those appearances, he’s had 2 hits and 6 strikeouts. Not pretty numbers. This just isn’t working. Now, Micah’s still putting up a decent average at the plate in his starts, batting .286. That isn’t going to win much acclaim, but that’s pretty impressive for a pitcher, and his OBP is actually better in his starts this season (.359) than it was last year (.339). So he’s still got a pretty decent plate presence for a pitcher. But he’s not a pinch hitter.
This problem is particularly bad when you pass up so many people who have the potential to be good batters- did you seriously look down the bench today and think that Owings was a better choice at the plate than Chad Tracy, Jeff Salazar, or Stephen Drew? Yeah, I understand, there are match ups to take into consideration, with the left-handed pitcher and all, but a little check of the stats tells me that Micah has performed better against right-handed pitching, while Drew has done better against lefties in his career. I mean, Webb’s got an OPS of .804 against lefties this season, versus Micah’s .411- maybe you should have handed him the bat.
That took me about thirty seconds to figure out on ESPN’s web page, so I’m sure you’ve got a guy who can tell you how they all do against pitchers with an equal number of vowels and consonants in their name, and that guy is probably also wondering why you ran Micah out there. So, my point is this, Melvin- yes, you’re the mad scientist, but how about a little bit more science out there?






6 Responses to “How ’bout some more science, Melvin?”
June 20th, 2008 at 12:26 am
I’ve been wondering how the increase in stats available online instantaneously would affect coaching strategies.
Not much, I guess.
I do use the Theodore Geisel Vowel-Consonant Ratio in my coaching.
June 20th, 2008 at 10:11 am
there thinkin of trying him out as a DH. oh god.
June 20th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Yeah, the idea of Micah in the DH is as inevitable as our dread of it. If we didn’t have any bats on the bench, maybe, I could see it. But we do- especially once Byrnes comes back, if they’re going to play him every day, the DH will be our best opportunity to keep Tracy, Reynolds, and Jackson in the lineup together. I mean, that’s a lineup that I’d be excited to see run out there. We’ll see how it goes.
June 20th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Remember, statistically, you can’t tell much of anything from a small sample size. 12 PA is almost nothing in terms of a sample size.
June 20th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
I understand that, yeah. But it’s all we’ve got to go on here. And when a guy strikes out in 50% of his PH appearances, as opposed to striking out in just over 25% of his plate appearances as a starter, you have to start suspecting that he’s not meant to be a pinch hitter.
June 20th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
[…] I need to figure out some way to objectively measure contact performance. (Really, I need more science to my mad.) […]
Leave a comment