Aaron Laffey has lost his early-season touch Photo by firebrandal/flickr
What’s up with Aaron Laffey?
Tribe fans talk about next year’s starting rotation and how thin it is.
“We got Lee, Carmona and Laffey” they say. “After that who knows.”
Better put Aaron Laffey in the “who knows” category.
On June 24, after holding the Giants to a run on four hits in 6 1/3 innings at the Jake, Laffey’s ERA was 2.83.
Five starts later, his ERA is 4.23, and he is 1-3 in those five starts.
It’s pretty difficult to add a run and a half to your ERA in five starts, but Laffey managed.
Here’s how:
In the past five starts, Laffey has pitched 23 2/3 innings and allowed 22 earned runs. I don’t even need my calculator to know that is darned near a 9.00 ERA.
He has given up 38 hits and 12 walks during that stretch. Again, I don’t need to my calculator to know that comes out to a WHIP of just over 2.00 and nearly 5 walks per 9 innings.
Is his confidence rattled? Are his mechanics off? Has the league figured him out?
That’s hard to say sitting in my living room in suburban NY, but something is clearly out of kilter.
So much so, that Tribe manager Eric Wedge wouldn’t make any promises when asked whether Laffey might not be the guy to go down to Buffalo to get straightened out when Fausto Carmona comes back at the end of the week.
After Laffey gave up 8 runs on 12 hits in just four innings plus in today’s game in Anaheim, Wedge was non-committal when asked about the roster move coming up Friday - telling MLB.com’s Anthony Castrovince:
“We’re not going to decide anything right now,” manager Eric Wedge said. “We don’t need to do anything until Friday night after the game, at the earliest. We haven’t made any decisions just yet.”
Matt Ginter is the presumed odd-man-out, but he’s put up two quality starts in two tries since joining the Tribe’s rotation in what was supposed to be a cameo role.
Jeremy Sowers, who has been a major disappointment this season could also go, but it is likely (at least I think so) that the Tribe - which has already farmed out Sowers this year for retooling - will want to keep him up in the hopes he can work things out on the big-league level between now and the end of September.
Which brings us to the bullpen.
I had planned to do a piece tonight about how the pen seems to be coming around and how it has been central to the Tribe’s recent run of victories.
An then today - and Tom Mastny and Jensen Lewis - happened. The duo combined to give up 6 runs over three innings in relief of Mastny, rendering moot any effort the Tribe’s offense made to make a game of it. And that doesn’t even count the 3 runs of Laffey’s that Mastny gave up on a grand slam by Angel’s catcher Jeff Mathis.
In Mastny’s defense, he last pitched 10 days ago. I’ve said it time and again this year and in the past, I don’t know how Wedge expects his 4-7 relievers to be of any value whatsoever when he pitches them once every leap year or so. But still, Mastny was awful and Lewis wasn’t much better.
But the bullpen has been strong in the past 9 games before today - a stretch which saw the Tribe go 7-2.
During that run, the pen has tossed 28 innings allowed 6 earned runs, 17 hits and 7 walks. That’s an ERA of 1.92 and a WHIP of 0.86 (I’m not going to let the stats I dug up go top waste). Exclude one 4-run blowup by Juan Rincon, and the Tribe’s bullpen ERA during the 9-game run is 0.64.
Masa Kobayashi has 2 saves and Mastny, of all people, has the pen’s lone win during the Tribe’s recent hot streak.
More importantly, a few key pitchers seem to be settling into roles. Raffy Perez, back firmly in the set-up role where he excelled last year, threw 7 innings in four appearances over the 9 games and did not allow a run.
Kobayashi had the 2 saves and has pitched well in general since taking over the closer’s role. Edward Mujica threw 4 2/3 scoreless innings during the stretch as he has begun to make a move toward the latter innings of games.
The roles being established now though appear to be nothing more than an attempt to wrestle this season under control. While impressions will be made the rest of the way, it’s doesn’t appear as though anyone will be locking up their role for next season.
In another piece for MLB.com, Castrovince reports that Wedge sees the bullpen situation as - shall we say - fluid.
“The roles are wide open,” Wedge said. “But I do see signs. We’ve got plenty of time to continue to look at these guys. They’re going to have an opportunity to step up and figure out if they can play a prominent role in this thing.”
Still, in the same piece, Castrovince reports the Tribe doesn’t think it will find its 2009 closer on its 2008 club, again quoting Wedge:
“A lot would have to happen with the people we have down there now for us to not go out and get somebody,” Wedge said. “Somebody would have to grab the role, really lock into it and prove that we can count on them. That’s a lot to happen in two and a half months.”






12 Responses to “What’s up with Aaron Laffey?”
July 23rd, 2008 at 9:44 pm
I’d give Laffey a few more starts to see if he can turn it around. He’s still a better bet than Sowers, as is Ginter. Mastny should be sent down and written off. He’s not a major league pitcher.
Separately, why is Dellucci still playing? The next game he starts should be the trigger for firing Wedge.
Why are we resting Blake, Peralta, and Shoppach? To keep them fresh for what? And didn’t they just have 4.5 days off last week during the All Star break?
What is with Wedge these days? I don’t get it.
July 24th, 2008 at 5:46 am
I agreee with every point you make - except the Wedge firing thing.
I’m no big fan, but when a new manager comes in, the whole thing starts over from scratch. I’m not ready to go through that again just yet.
July 24th, 2008 at 8:41 am
agreed. Talk of Wedge being fired should be curbed for two reasons:
1. It ain’t gonna happen. Have you heard how Shapiro talks about him? So talking about firing Wedge and having a new manager at the start of next year is as pointless as talking about how all our problems would be solved if we could just get Albert Pujols and K-Rod next year. If you’re still not used to watching his facial ticks, you’d better get there.
2. He’s not a likable guy, he’s certainly not awe-inspiring to the fan base, but, as Ron said, canning him now turns the rest of this season — which should be an extended open audition and a fact-finding mission for 2009 — into a big bowl of chaos, which is counterproductive to what they are trying to achieve (and what we should want them to achieve).
July 24th, 2008 at 9:23 am
I realize Wedge won’t be fired and my statement was hyperbole. That said, I really don’t get what he’s doing. There seems to be a real drop-off in his performance, with no rational explanation for playing Dellucci, refusing to try Peralta at 3rd, his curious decision about who rests and when, and his mishandling of the bullpen. I’ve never been much of a fan of Wedge but he seems to be having a particularly bad year.
July 24th, 2008 at 9:23 am
I assume that the reason Dellucci is getting playing time is the hope that he’ll perform well enough that they can unload his contract on a team needing a left handed bat off the bench, but I just don’t think it’s going to happen. He’s a waste of a roster spot and, as they say, a sunk cost. If the trade deadline comes and goes w/o Dellucci being dealt, I’m in favor of D.F.A. Then bring up Aubrey and give him some playing time. We’re going to be faced with a decision on Michael heading into next season so we better find out now if he’s worth keeping. I don’t think you can ever place full blame on a Manager for using a player on the roster. If you can’t put a guy in a game he shouldn’t be on the roster in the first place.
July 24th, 2008 at 10:43 am
Agreeing with Mick, I would say Dellucci’s playing time will considerably diminish, if he even retains a roster spot, after the deadline. Taking the question further, if Jhonny Peralta gets dealt to the Dodgers and ends up playing shortstop in LA, does it make Wedge look more or less smart in your eyes? We can’t really judge anything that goes on until August hits, because the motives behind positional and personnel decisions may be based on showcasing.
Now, once August hits, all bets are off.
July 24th, 2008 at 11:14 am
is my stance on Peralta being stated clear enough or should I reiterate
?
July 24th, 2008 at 11:31 am
one of the great things about being associated with this site is that people who comment hear use the word “hyperbole” and really know what it means.
Dave I kind of thought your fire-Wedge thing was hyperbole (like saying “I’m going to kill him if…”) and I was going to say so. But I wasn’t sure (based on my experience with other message boards) that anyone would know what the word meant. I shoud have known better.
It’s a pleasure talking sports with people with a brain. We may not really know what we’re talking about, but at least we can say it well.
July 24th, 2008 at 11:33 am
now if I could only type correctly!
July 24th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Ron, what is your suburb, by the way? if you don’t mind me asking…
July 24th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
Pearl River. On the Jersey side of the Hudson, but in NY (close enough to the Jersey border to buy my gas in NJ, where it’s about 30 cents cheaper due to the high gas tax (like every other tax) in NY.
July 24th, 2008 at 2:24 pm
Apparently, the Rangers are looking for a young pitcher in return for Hank Blalock. I know one that’s available . . . they can have Andy Marte as a kicker, too.
Leave a comment