The first two years
Defense:
There’s a hole in the prosecution’s case about as wide as Livan Hernandez’ posterior. For the first two years of his tenure as GM Jim Bowden didn’t have a boss. There was no Stienbrenner, no Veeck, no Ted Turner. Sure that means no meddling, but it also means no direction. How can you expect a man to reach point B when he’s got no compass, no map? The answer is simple. You can’t.
Worse yet instead of a boss, there was a Bud. Bud Selig. The man who ended an All-Star game in a tie, who tried to contract the Minnesota Twins, who turend a blind eye to steroids for god knows how long. You expect anyone to succeed under this man? Bud and a committee of probably 40 fat cats were trying to wring every last cent from this team. That means Bowden’s job was to put some lipstick on this pig and sell it at market. Make sure it’s cheap lipstick to, because major league baseball just can’t afford any big signings. Boo hoo.
You think you as fans suffered, well Jim suffered to. Imagine getting a second chance at your dream job and being hamstrung like this? Payroll severly limited, team gutted, now build us a team we can sell? Talk about your impossible job.
The funny thing is he did it. He took these lemons and for two years made lemonade. In 2005, he put together an 81 win team, a team that was in first place for a good part of the season and drafted a player most people thnk could be a cornerstone, franchise player in Ryan Zimmerman. In 2006, he traded for one of the more exciting players in baseball and brought in several potential young position starters. Fans were interested. The city committed to a new stadium. The team was sold. His old bosses were happy, and the new bosses were impressed enough that they kept him on. They didn’t keep the manager on. They gutted most of the staff, but they kept him on. The prsecution will try to tell you that Jim Bowden didn’t do his job well these first two years, I ask you , if everyone was happy, how can this tenure be considered a failure?
Prosecution:
If everyone was happy, how can this tenure be considered a failure?
The answer is simple. Because the goal of a GM is to balance two competing desires. Yes, it’s to make people happy, your boss, the fans, the players. But at the same time it’s to ensure these same people will be happy in the future by setting up the team for success in the long run. In that aspect Bowden, these first two years, failed and some might say he did so spectacularly.
2005 was a magical year, but what did Bowden really do? Most of the success lied with players already here. Nick Johnson, Jose Vidro, Ryan Church, Livan Hernandez, John Patterson, a killer bullpen. Do you know how many of the top 6 bullpen guys Bowden brought in? 1.
For every decent move he made there was a matching horrible one. Esteban Loaiza? Vinny Castilla. Jose Guillen? Cristian Guzman. His biggest work was done with the bench, a group so horrible their names make Nats fans shudder to this day. Wil ”Wife Beater” Cordero, Carlos ”The Waddler” Baerga, Gary “PB” Bennett. The team went on this remarkable run more in spite of Jim Bowden than because of. And when it came time to make that last push, to capitalize on an amazing first half…they traded for Junior Spivey, out of baseball after that year, Devei Cruz, out of baseball after that year. Preston Wilson at least made it to 2007, but let’s not forget hewas brought in for his fielding.
Not only did his moves not help this team, and possibly hurt the team, but they made the team worse for the future. The Nats had pitching depth. Mediocre pitching depth but at least it was something. That depth was gutted. Gone Claudio Vargas, Zack Day, Tomo Ohka. Don’t care? What about Scott Downs, Macier Iztruis, Juan Rivera. Guys we should be seeing soon Val Pascucci, Alejandro Machado? These were all at least relatively young players. Relatively cheap players. Gone. Not to get younger or cheaper mind you. The 2005 Nationals were the oldest team in the league! Useful talent gone for what? For nothing.
2006 looked fine in comparison to 2005, but it wasn’t a winner by any means. His two biggest deals failed at their ultimate goals and worse yet, he gave up young pitching to make these deals. He did not turn Soriano into a haul of major league ready top prospects. Gone is Armando Galarraga Austin Kearns and Felipe Lopez haven’t turned out to be useful everyday players. Gone is Bill Bray, Gary Majewski, and Daryl Thompson. If you are going to give up decent young pitching, the most precious commodity a team can have, I’m sorry but those deals have to work.
It wasn’t until August of 2006, with the Stanton and Livan deals that Bowden got younger and got pitching back. He did some more work when dealing Marlon Anderson and Daryle Ward. But for me, it’s too little too late.
Look at that track record. Look at what the man did. Maybe he was just following a mandate from baseball, but I guarantee you the mandate wasn’t mortgage the team’s future by losing every useful young player you can find!
He may have made everyone happy, and for that, he should be recognized, but he did it by taking a beaten farm system and kicking it while it was down. A GM must succeed at both levels, not just one. This team shouldn’t be happy with half a GM. The team deserves better.






5 Responses to “The first two years”
June 25th, 2008 at 11:25 am
I’d point out that while MLB might have been happy, while the Lerner’s may have been happy, I think the aggrieved party, and the judge and jury here, are the fans. So the question is, are/were the fans happy.
And frankly, happiness isn’t even the question. I’d prefer a smug, arrogant GM who trades away my favorite players but fields a winner over a likeable GM who fields me the Nats. Being likeable isn’t the end result, being a winner is.
Cheap can come in two forms. Young, and old. It seems to me that JimBo was told to go cheap. He had two choices, go young and cheap, or go old and cheap. Old and cheap is mediocre now, young and cheap might be, but has more upside. He went old and cheap, and we are paying for it now.
JimBo was just a henchman carrying out his duties. A guy trying to keep one of only 32 jobs in the country.
My verdict remains: Guild on Franslaughter, not guilty on 1st degree murder of a franchise. The real criminal here is MLB.
June 25th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
An obvious exhibit for the defense: the build up of the farm system. From zero teams in the DSL to two teams (one of which won the title last year); one of the best drafts in baseball last year (and 20 out of the top 20 signed); up and coming pitchers, many of whom made the all star team from Vermont last year, many of whom made it to Potomac this year (and some promoted beyond that), giving Potomac the first-half title.
MLB’s destruction of the farm system can’t be fixed overnight — but what I see in the minors now is light years ahead of where it was two years ago.
June 25th, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Oops, and I forgot: Ryan Zimmerman, Lastings Milledge, Elijah Dukes and John Lannan are all just 23, and all have plenty of potential to improve a great deal. Dukes was gotten for one of the Vermont pitchers I mentioned in the last comment. Jesus Flores is also very young (and was a terrific steal). Another up-and-coming pitcher is Jordan Zimmermann (I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets a taste of the bigs at the end of this year). Van Allen and Martis, both also promoted past Potomac are looking pretty good right now, too.
In short, for players 23-and-younger, the Nats have a pretty fine organization. Turning a franchise around — after the future was mortgaged — takes time.
June 25th, 2008 at 5:20 pm
JimBo had total freedom. He said so. Everyone said so. There’ no evidence of meddling. And it’s not the owner’s job to provide direction. Owners that provide direction are bad, meddling Danny Snyder owners.
“MLB’s destruction of the farm system can’t be fixed overnight — but what I see in the minors now is light years ahead of where it was two years ago.”
Right–but those first 2 years were wasted. So you get to watch bad baseball for 5-6 years instead of 3-4 because Bowden wasted the first 2 years acquiring short-term rentals and declining players for teams going nowhere. And, you have a GM in charge of the project now who, while he’s done some good things to rebuild (at gunpoint), he’s never shown any aptitude or interest in this. He’s a notoriously hyperactive, impatient, terrible drafter. And even now he’s not really sticking to the plan, like spending 6m to block Flores with bad/old vets.
June 25th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Well, I guess I’m giving the benefit of the doubt to Bowden when he didn’t have a boss. The last two years’ growth of the farm system has been really really solid. (You said bad draft picks, but I don’t see that at all — Baseball Prospectus ranks the Nats as one of the best drafts for 2007).
I’m very pleased with the progress in the last two years. I guess the question is (and I haven’t really thought about it till now) is whether the time prior to two years ago should be held against Bowden. I just don’t know.
(As for LoDuca — yeah, that was pretty stupid. But Flores seems to have won the job. And signing Dmitri tp a two-year deal last yaer looks pretty smarat these days)
But, again, I’ve been following the farm system a lot last season and this, and I really like what I see. The really good crop is just starting to reach AA now.
Leave a comment