Rangers Quote Of The Week: 3/16 Plus Edition
Is Jarrod Saltalamacchia (pictured above) the Texas Rangers' backstop of the future? - Anthony Amobi/MVN
Another week, another quote pertaining to the Texas Rangers’ still muddled backstop situation. Let’s get this over with, shall we?
“I don’t want to go to Triple A, and I don’t think there’s any reason for me to go to Triple A. I’ve proven my ability in the big leagues as a hitter. Atlanta called me up as a catcher, and I’ve proven myself in spring training.
“I want to be in the big leagues. I want the starting job. That’s my goal, and that’s what I want to do.”
Catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia, commenting late last week on the bleak possibility of being shipped back to Triple-A Oklahoma to begin the 2008 season. With fellow backstop Gerald Laird seemingly having won the starting job behind the plate, the Rangers can now delegate one of two roles upon their their 22-year-old catcher: everyday starting catcher at Oklahoma City, or backup catcher/right-handed designated hitter in Arlington.
Sounds like Jarrod knows pretty definitively which role he’d like going forward.
Whichever role you feel is the correct role for Saltalamacchia is very likely dependent on whether or not you feel this 2008 Rangers squad has an outside shot at being competitive. Though a prolonged stint with the Redhawks might well aid his long-term development (both offensively and defensively), a catching tandem consisting of Laird and the ever-mediocre Adam Melhuse would probably be baseball’s equivalent of a black hole in the Texas lineup, sucking up precious outs while providing sub-replacement level production at the plate.
For obvious reasons, that would be relatively damaging to this team’s projected 2008 win totals.
There is, of course, that somewhat dubious possibility of Gerald returning to 2006 form, when he clubbed seven home runs in 260 plate appearances and provided a lovely .296/.332/.473 (105 OPS+) line at the plate. But even then, the vast majority of his offensive value was derived from his work against southpaws, whom he torched to the tune of a Sammy Sosa-esque .400/.414/.600 in 88 PA. Against right-handers, Laird batted a far less appetizing .241/.291/.405 in 172 PA.
Though Saltalamacchia, admittedly, didn’t show terribly much in his limited work against left-handers last season (.226/.268/.357 with four homers in 123 PA), a lineup showcasing Jarrod as the right-handed DH would be far preferable to that of one featuring, oh, say, Kevin Mench, in terms of pure entertainment value. But would such an arrangement really help to facilitate the further polishing of Saltalamacchia’s improving, yet still rough, defensive game? Probably not.
And herein lies the great dilemma facing the Texas Rangers. With yet another top catching prospect - in the person of former Texas Longhorn Taylor Teagarden - steadily barreling down the minor league pipeline, Saltalamacchia finds himself in a precarious position.
Another strong campaign from Teagarden in 2008, combined with a lack of opportunity (or results, as the unfortunate by-product of inconsistent playing time) for Saltalamacchia at the big league level, could quite feasibly knock the latter down a peg on the organizational catching depth chart, and perhaps even trigger frenzied mid-summer trade talks to ship Jarrod out of town forever.
And boy, would that be disappointing to see. For as much as I like what Teagarden brings to the table, Saltalamacchia’s gorgeous, fluid swing and seemingly limitless offensive potential as a catcher have fully captured my imagination. Make no mistake about it, I want to see Jarrod establish himself as the catcher of the future here in Texas.
And when playoff baseball finally makes its glorious, long-awaited return to the Temple, I want to see Jarrod behind the plate, snapping cool, collected throws back to his pitcher, taking control of the game through not just his game-changing bat, but also his refined glovework, throwing arm and battery communication skills.
Watching a player like Gerald Laird - a decent stopgap, but hardly somebody that figures into the Rangers’ long-term plans - potentially even dent Saltalamacchia’s chances of becoming what I think he can become in Texas is, by far, the most distressing development to come out of Surprise this spring, as far as I’m concerned.
Here’s to hoping Jon Daniels and company find a way to properly resolve this situation in a timely manner - and to ensure that Saltalamacchia, regardless of the steps required to make it so, yet becomes one of the undeniable cornerstones of this franchise.
* * * * *
Elsewhere in the baseball realm:
● Top pitching prospect Eric Hurley tossed four quality innings against the Colorado Rockies on Saturday afternoon, surrendering a pair of runs on just two hits and two walks while flashing an impressive 95 MPH heater and 69 MPH curve (granted, velocity readings that might have been something less than totally accurate in light of Mark Redman’s own bizarre 91 MPH reading).
As the great Jamey Newberg often emphasizes: Patience.
● Kevin Millwood (strained left hamstring), Joaquin Benoit (weak right arm) and C.J. Wilson (left biceps tendinitis) were all dominant during their respective minor league outings against Seattle’s High-A squad on Saturday, an encouraging step forward for the trio of ailing hurlers.
Mike Hindman of “Rangers Farm Report” has the complete scoop on their performances in terms of pure velocity and movement, noting that Millwood looked “very healthy” and that Benoit “appeared to be nearly back to full strength,” but that C.J.’s fastball, which normally sits in the mid-90’s, was missing around 5-7 MPH. Not a major concern, but still something worth keeping an eye on.
Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News, meanwhile, sums up the Rangers’ new plan for Millwood:
Millwood is scheduled to pitch in his only “A” game of the spring Thursday. His final scheduled start would fall on March 25th when the Rangers play Seattle, but the club doesn’t want him to face the Mariners on the 25th and then again six days later on Opening Day.
So, if the schedule remains the same, Millwood would pitch in a minor league game on the 25th. What is still in question is the weather. It is iffy for Sunday and a rainout could push everybody in the rotation back a day. That would then allow Millwood to pitch in an “A” game on Friday and again on March 26th, then have four days of rest before facing the Mariners in the season opener.
● Don’t think a tornado could ever hit Rangers Ballpark in Arlington while a game was in progress? Think again. The National Weather Service has confirmed that an EF2 tornado swept through downtown Atlanta on Friday night, sideswiping the 71,000-seat Georgia Dome during an SEC tournament basketball game between Mississippi State and Alabama and tearing multiple holes in the dome’s roof with 2:11 left in overtime.
One can only shudder to think what kind of havoc such a traumatic weather event might create at an outdoor sporting event, particularly with upwards of 20,000 people in attendance.
● Finally, MLB.com’s T.R. Sullivan brings us this bit of quotable goodness from the Rangers’ minor league offices:
Rangers Minor League officials made a study of their six farm teams over the final three months of the 2007 season.
The officials found when their clubs allowed five or fewer free bases in a game, those clubs won an astounding 91 percent of their games. They also found out that Major League playoff teams are the ones that allowed an average of less than five free bases per game.
“We want that to be the identity of our organization, being good at not allowing the free base,” Rangers farm director Scott Servais. “That’s something we talk about with our players every day. Oakland’s identity is high on-base percentage. The Angels are known for their aggressiveness and putting pressure on the other team. This is what we need to be known for.”
Servais said the free base comes in seven different areas: walks, hit batter, passed ball, wild pitch, balk, error and stolen base.
Well, imagine that! Who would have thought that allowing fewer walks and committing fewer mistakes would be conducive to winning more games? Next you’ll be telling me that drawing more walks and collecting more hits helps you to…oh, right.
And not to unnecessarily bag on Scott Servais, who is by all accounts a fine baseball man, but wouldn’t something as abstract as “being good at not allowing the free base” be something that you would want to inherently strive for anyway, as opposed to something you would want to build your organizational identity around? Just strikes me as a rather odd curiosity, is all.
Fifteen days until Opening Day.





10 Responses to “Rangers Quote Of The Week: 3/16 Plus Edition”
March 16th, 2008 at 9:13 am
Considering that the Rangers have a youth movement of arms making their way towards Arlington, wouldn’t you rather sacrifice a little offense in order to offer them a battery mate that is a plus defender with the baseball intelligence to excel at calling games?
Of course this all depends on the health of Teagarden, but it raises an interesting question: Offensive value or defensive value?
Personally, I’m tired of watching the Rangers struggle on the bump. The talent has been the main issue but we have also lacked a catcher with the baseball acumen to assist in the productivity of our staff.
The Rangers need to offer every advantage available to improve the staff and if we have to sacrifice a little offensive value to do so, I’m all for it.
Teagarden for catcher in ‘09.
March 16th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Perhaps. I know there are a great many Ranger fans who are completely aboard the Teagarden train - and make no mistake about it, his defensive game, by all accounts, is Major League-ready.
Still, something (and I’m not exactly sure what) makes me just a bit wary of Taylor. Perhaps it was Mike Hindman’s January report that planted the initial seed of doubt in my head:
“Assuming his arm proves to be 100% (he had a setback or two last summer), Teagarden will clearly enjoy a career as a premium defensive big league catcher. The question remains whether he’ll hit enough to make him an all-star. He might, but I think he’s going to be a low-average hitter with average to above average power in the big leagues.
Tegarden strikes out a lot. That, in and of itself, doesn’t bother me much. It didn’t bother me much while watching his Bakersfield numbers this summer because he was also drawing walks (0.73 BB/K ratio in 292 at-bats), suggesting that he was going deep in counts on a regular basis. But when he got to Frisco, where once again the core numbers were excellent (.294 / .357 / .529 in 102 at-bats), Teagarden’s BB/K ratio dove sharply (0.26) and there were times when his long, hitchy swing was painfully obvious.”
Further, his BABIPs at Bakersfield (.396) and Frisco (.421) suggest he was somewhat lucky last season, though his line drive rates weren’t terribly out of line at either stop. I’m not entirely sure what to make out of all this data, but I am sure of one thing: we’ll all know a lot more by July.
I suppose the great question is whether Teagarden’s enhanced defensive game and, as you say Jason, better pitcher handling skills are worth more in terms of run prevention than the additional offensive value provided by Salty. Personally, I’d lean towards the latter - but that’s not to say that both skill sets aren’t particularly valuable in their own right. I’ve yet to see Teagarden during a live game like I have with Salty, and perhaps my stance is fueled, in part, by my familiarity with Salty.
Nice problem to have, regardless.
March 16th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
It’s also worth noting that Matt Walbeck (whose opinion I’m beginning to respect very much) believes that Salty’s defensive game is rapidly improving:
“He’s getting closer,” Walbeck said. “His communication with the pitchers has been very good, and his throwing has improved. I know there are a lot of teams out there who would love to have the guy.”
March 16th, 2008 at 3:40 pm
Salty is so the real deal. It would be a shame to send him to Triple A. It’s not as if the Rangers are going to be a whole lot more competitive and give the Mariners and Angels a hard time. I would make him their everyday catcher right now and trade away Taylor just as he peaks in the minors this year. It would only make sense to trade him for pitching because that’s what the Rangers need. Salty all the way!
March 16th, 2008 at 3:47 pm
JD needs to call Boston and make this offer: Kevin Millwood and Salty for Bucholtz and Crisp. If that doesn’t work, try the same deal except with Lester.
March 16th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Excellent article on the catching situation, Joey. Great stuff.
The Salty vs. Tea arguement is defnitely an interesting one - the classic offense vs. defense arguement.
But one factor I don’t think anyone is considering is Christian Santana. Yes, he’s a good ways off yet, but he is coming - and if he’s really as good as they say, he should make pretty good time though the system - do you think having him lurking down there might play a role in the Rangers decision, and perhaps make Teagarden a little more expendable?
After all, Tea is older than Salty, and has a history of health problems - I still think that there’s a very good chance that Tea winds up trade bait for those reasons anyway - and with Santana in the system, you might think the Rangers will feel he’s more expendable than Salty, since they have another player with a similar skill set in the minors. What do you think?
March 16th, 2008 at 5:03 pm
Santana has played only 6 games above the AZL league. His bat seems very promising but his defense is still a question mark. He is considered very athletic (some scouts think he could move to CF!) but he is still a very raw baseball player especially behind the plate.
Even if he is on the fast track, his ETA is probably late 2010 at the earliest. I doubt the Rangers of ‘08 or ‘09 will make personnel decisions based on the progress of Cristian Santana.
The good news for the Rangers is that having too many elite catching prospects is never a bad thing. I’m still placing my bets on Teagarden being the long-term answer at catcher with Salty eventually being moved via trade.
Perhaps I’ve just convinced myself that the performance of our arms will improve with an intelligent game caller behind the plate. I’m still a fan of Salty but I’m not sure the Rangers would benefit from the increased offensive value at the expense of losing the defensive stylings of TayTea.
March 16th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Yeah, good point about Santana - I wasn’t aware his defense behind the plate was that bad (I actually thought all the raves about his “athleticisim” meant he was pretty good), but I did know he’s still a long ways off.
The arguement you’re making about the need for a strong defensive catcher though, that only really makes sense if Salty where a horrible game caller - which really isn’t the case, at least not according to Matt Walbeck. And as for his arm, there’s other catchers who seem to get by without having great throwing abilities - Paul Lo Duca, for one, and Josh Bard for another. Watching him some last year behind the plate, I just don’t get this idea people have that he can’t play the catchers position - no, he’s not Pudge, and he never will be, but I think if he realizes the potential of his bat, his defense will be good enough, and will probably continue to improve.
Teagarden, on the other hand, has yet to even swing the bat in the big leagues, and with the fact that he’s older than Salty, coupled with his durability questions, I just have a hard time stomaching the thought of throwing Salty aside for him - unless, of course, Salty were to play a full season this year and dissapoint.
That’s why I really feel Salty needs to be the full-time catcher this year - the Salty/Tea question is one the Rangers need to get right, and the Rangers should be taking every possible step to make sure they get a good enough look at both players to make the decision. But playing Laird does absolutely nothing for either Salty or Tea - in fact, it probably hurts both of them.
March 16th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
Fair points, Jason. It’s fair to say that both sides of this offensive/defensive philosophy argument can be easily understood.
Regarding Santana, he doesn’t even turn 19 until mid-June. Hard to see him making a legitimate push to Arlington until at least late 2010; more realistically, it might be 2011 before he truly establishes himself behind the plate, assuming he isn’t moved to another position first (a corner outfield spot might not be out of the question, if his range is discovered to be not quite great enough for CF).
But then, that’s looking a bit far into the future.
March 17th, 2008 at 10:01 am
Hello!
I think this try.
Leave a comment