MVN - a Tampa Bay Rays blog
Outs Per Swing
Why Trade For Joe Blanton?
Why Should The Rays Trade For Joe Blanton?
Our good friends at MLB Trade Rumors have cooked up another appetizer for Rays fans, as it is being reported that Tampa is one of three possible teams talking to Oakland about pitcher Joe Blanton. Blanton, a 27 year old right hander, was a first round pick by the Athletics in 2002 out of Kentucky. Since joining the A’s rotation in 2005, he has 42-34 with a 4.10 ERA.
Having made one move for Matt Garza earlier this off-season, general manager Andrew Friedman is once again in the mix for another possible arm to add to the starting staff. Whether that’s a smart move or not is something we’ll analyze later, but there is no doubt that Blanton does provide one asset the Rays need. Durability.
The 6-2, 220 (he looks bigger than that) pounder has averaged 208 innings the past three years, including a career high 230 frames in 2007. A contact oriented pitcher, Blanton has given up more than a hit an inning, while punching out only 5.2 per nine. By no means an ace, Blanton is serviceable and can be counted on in the right situation. Does that mean Tampa? Well, it depends on what Oakland GM Billy Beane wants in return.
I feel that Rays fans and media still must temper their excitement about this team, because they are still two years away from competing heavily in the AL East. The parts are in place, but it will take further progression and growth from the minor league level before they can claim arrival. We all want that to happen sooner, but unfortunately that’s just not the case.
So, adding Blanton provides what? He is cost controlled until after the 2010 season, bringing great quality for a salary that adds very little to the Rays payroll. Assuming his career trends continue, you can pencil him for 200 league-average innings with the chance that he can improve those numbers slightly.
By the time he’s getting ready for free agency, he could conceivably bring up the back end of the Rays rotation in a strong fashion. Problem is, when it all shakes out, will Blanton be redundant and keep someone with greater ability from reaching the majors? Probably. Who you ask?
Let’s look at it from a numbers perspective. The number one through three positions in the rotation are spoken for, presumably until at least 2010. It breaks down like this.
1. Scott Kazmir
2. James Shields
3. Matt Garza (acquired in Delmon Young trade)
From there, you have genuine competition for the final two slots. Right now, you have four arms battling, with that number only growing in the next two seasons. Here’s the group that could be in the mix by 2009.
Possibles: David Price, Andy Sonnastine, Jeff Neimann, Wade Davis, Jake McGee
That’s just a short list, and you could include three others rather easily (Mason, Hellickson, Talbot). You can really argue that Price is a lock, and while you might debate McGee, there is little to suggest that Niemann or Davis won’t be ready by 2009, if not sooner.
It’s crowded already, and having Blanton lock down a spot seems repetitive. While it is still potential right now, I feel that Price, Davis and McGee can all be better than him. At worst I feel Niemann can provide the same production, so again the question becomes, why acquire him?
The second point of this argument is the bounty it will require to retain Blanton’s services. You can’t use the Dan Haren package as comparison, because Haren’s a better pitcher with a more dominant arsenal. So, what are you willing to give up to get Joe Blanton?
Beane will most likely ask for the moon, before settling somewhere in the upper regions of the atmosphere. That probably means Desmond Jennings, or one of the pitchers we mentioned above. If you feel that those arms can be better than Blanton, than why trade them away to pick him up?
Just doesn’t make sense to me. Now, if you can get him for a lesser package that doesn’t ask for anyone in the top five of my “Tampa Bay Top 10″, than maybe I bite. But, we all know that’s not likely. Jennings is #8, and I almost deem him off limits. So will there be anything that Beane is going to want? Doubtful.
This is a fun rumor, and gives me and other bloggers something to write about. It’s very unlikely to ever come to fruition, but it keeps the Hot Stove burning for the final two weeks before pitchers and catchers report. Blanton’s a good pitcher, but ultimately his worth and where he’ll fit in Rays plans just doesn’t match. I say pass.





7 Responses to “Why Trade For Joe Blanton?”
February 8th, 2008 at 2:11 am
Beane will get at least one top 5 prospect from someone for Blanton. I mean he got more than that for Swisher. If the Rays mae a deal I’d lay 5 to 1 odds they’ll overpay fro the privilege.
February 8th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
I agree the Rays should pass on this for some of the reasons cited, but that comes with the standard caveat regarding prospects. I’d wait and see for your reasons cited that it’s a “now” move in a “soon” environment, but also because Blanton might not be quite as good as his portfolio appears. So if you’re gonna make adeal cashing a big chip, perhaps a better target is in order.
As I commented in another Rays blog, at least your team is getting included as a destination in the rumor mill. A far cry from the “Who are the Rays ditching next?” days. Becoming a destination rather than a departure point. Big step in the market!
February 8th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Blanton would be great for a contending team like the Braves, Mets, and Phillies, but not for a rebuilding team because he would be asked to be more than a #3 starter, which he is not.
February 10th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
Hello this is 3/10 & this story never had a chance
February 10th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
I commend them for atleast testing the waters on Blanton. You never know, maybe Beane has been tryin to deal him all winter and is ready to sell low. We dont know what the asking price is. I will say this, the FO has alot of smart people working up there and maybe they feel like the prospects are a bit overhyped? Maybe they think they need to win 80 games next season to help get the new stadium? I do worry about making any trade with Beane though. I faith that the the FO wouldnt get fleeced Ed Wade style. I do. Why not atleast see what the asking price is?
February 11th, 2008 at 11:04 pm
It is so great to hear the Rays talk future, and to have such a strong pitching staff. Blanton is a good #3 pitcher, with a good upside, but Billy B will try to get Santana prospects for him, and who will buy that?
February 12th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
Alot of you guys are way to quick to jump off this trade…Half of you probably dont even know who this guy is…Hes a former 1st round pick hes 27 so not like hes an old man, he eats up more than 200 inn a year, and hes proven himself at the big league level… he had a 2.69 home era this season…There is no dout david price is going to be a stud that is unless he gets hurt with all those inn. he threw at vandy but other than that if Beane gives a proven major league arm for a AAA pitcher your a idiot not to make the deal….that means 1-4 next season are solid (kaz, shields, garza, blanton)…this past season the Rays didnt hang with the big teams bc 1. no starting roto 2. no bullpen 3. weak ass manager…u make this deal and they will get out of the basement next year and if these guys could grow together and you put a pitcher with Price’s pot. and this team will be nasty for years..they have the off to play with the big teams now so if they sure up the starting roto they will win now…off wins games def and pitching wins championships…there bullpen is good enough anyone but the top few pitchers (price, andy, neimann, davis, mcgee) you have to make the deal and poss even for a neimann davis or mcgee
Leave a comment