October 13, 2008

Jacoby Ellsbury or Coco Crisp -- who's our CF?

Yesterday, I asked if Terry Francona should start Coco Crisp over Jacoby Ellsbury in Game 3, as Coco ended the season hot and Jacoby has been ice cold.

Jacoby has shown that he can disrupt pitchers and when he is hot, he directly impacts the games that he plays. If he can ever put it together over a string of 162 games, he'll be one of the most talked about players in the league. Until then, however, he is what he is: a rookie.

He's a great one and is a playmaker, but we have someone on the bench in Coco Crisp that is hot. So why keep Jacoby playing? It could be that Francona wants to keep throwing Jacoby out there so that he can get hot and make an impact. But why lead him off? If Coco and Jacoby had swapped spots in Game 2, we likely win the game due to Coco being on base (whereas Jacoby was... not).

As TC said in the comments,

Ellsbury looks overmatched most of the time. His slashing swing hasn’t been producing many hard hit balls. He’s often lunging over the plate as if he plans on taking a closer look at the pitch. The standard result is quick swing/weak contact.

The playoffs are no time to consider a man's feelings. So do we make the move for Game 3?

Tim Daloisio doesn't think so:

Ellsbury owns Garza, (6-13)…Coco not so much (1-9)

Fair enough. Ellsbury deserves the shot against Garza, the numbers are pretty stark.

What if, however, Ellsbury does another ofer? Do we then give him a day off and stick Coco in there in Game 4 (he would oppose Andy Sonnastine).

I say yes. You could even bench Jacoby and Coco, as Bob suggests:

It might be wise even to go with a Kotsay, Drew, Bay outfield and start Casey at 1st, thats the best hitting lineup they can put out there.

I'm not so sure that that's the best hitting lineup out there... you could argue for Jacoby or Coco over Kotsay. However, it's abundantly clear that to improve our offense, Sean Casey needs to be in the lineup.

But at what cost? Defense. You've seen the athletic plays that Kotsay has made; are we willing to cross that off the list for Casey's offensive dependability? It's a double-edged sword.

There's no easy answer to the issue of Coco and Jacoby, and it took until Game 6 last year before Tito finally gave up on Coco Crisp and inserted Jacoby Ellsbury the rest of the way.

I would argue that it should only take to Game 4 if Jacoby pulls another clunker against Matt Garza. He's our future centerfielder, there's no doubt about that, but at this point in time, we need to worry about October 2008, not 2009-2019.

Tags: Boston Red Sox, MLB, Red Sox

Discussion

4 Comments on "Jacoby Ellsbury or Coco Crisp -- who's our CF?"

#1

user-pic

Posted by jimc, October 13, 2008 10:32 AM

If I was manager, i would go with coco just because he is hitting the ball harder and more solid.

My big concern is Papi. Its embarrassing watching him bat. He looks clueless at the plate. If we are to win the series, Papi has to start connecting and hit some bombs with men on base.

Reply

#2

user-pic

Posted by Amber, October 13, 2008 11:29 AM

I would go for coco, jacoby is 0 for 11 so far in this series we can't have him at the top if he isn't going to produce. hve drew in RF in Coco in CF

Reply

#3

user-pic

Posted by M.A.G, October 13, 2008 1:42 PM

Ellsbury has played great against the Angels. His problem is the Rays piching knows him too well by now. They know his weak points and know how to take advantage of them. I hope, in the future, he will make the necessary adjustments.

So, in this series and in this moment, I will go with Coco. But if we advance, I will go with Ellbury again.

Reply

#4

user-pic

Posted by Gerry, October 13, 2008 2:48 PM

I think we all agree that Tito should use the right weapons at the appropriate time. Ells vs. Garza, Coco on Saturday, etc. IMO, the rare grousing about Tito is that he doesn't always seem to make the adjustments that seem so obvious to many of us. However, as often as not his strategies work, and we did manage to limp into the ALCS with the boat leaking and many of our big guns silenced.

In 2008 we had a true "4-man" outfield. Manny was often "hurt", and JD's back injury is serious. Fortunately, Coco was still around and played virtually full-time. But he is a starter, among the best in the Majors. In 2009, with a healthy Bay, Ellsbury and healthier JD, we won't need a "4-man" outfield, so top talent like Coco (and Kotsay) won't be happy at Fenway, and will move on in favor of high BA power bats like Jeff Bailey, Jon Van Every or Chris Carter.

This is a long way of saying we should enjoy Coco and Kotsay while we have them. They have added alot to a great year.

Reply

Leave a comment