Bengals Cut Odell Thurman For Missing Voluntary Workouts???
In a move more surprising by its timing than its reality, the Cincinnati Bengals released MLB Odell Thurman today. Re-instated a month ago after a two year suspension, Thurman energized a Bengal faithful still enamored with his tremendous rookie season. Early rumors say the Bengals cut Odell for not attending voluntary workouts shortly after his grandmother’s funeral. ProFootballTalk.com even referenced a possible conversation in which the Bengals told him to be back the day after the funeral or he would be released. Marvin Lewis’ vague response did little to quell the rumors:
“The NFL provided Odell the opportunity to earn his way back onto our team, but we have not seen the right steps taken by him, with our offseason work in progress and new talent added at our linebacker position, we’ve determined it’s best to keep moving in a direction that does not include Odell.”
Or maybe it does. Sure the timing is bad but let’s remember Odell position on the roster was tenuous at best. While being there with his family communication was key. It is also about more than just the past week. He was re-instated a month ago and cleared to workout at the team facilities before that. How well did he respond during that time? How was his attitude? Had he displayed how important this second chance was to him? In other words, prior to his grandmother’s death, was he working his tail off to earn back his spot? Seeing how the team unceremoniously cut him, the answer to those questions is not likely a positive one. If Thurman and his near minimum salary clears waivers (like Chris Henry before him) you will know whether or not other teams agree he is not worth the trouble despite his talent.
Bengal fans and the media who are surprised by the move have not been paying attention the past two years. First of all, Odell was not playing the past two years for a reason. A reason for which we will never fully know because of the confidentiality of the league’s substance abuse program. But Marvin knows. He knew Thurman had a long road back when he put Thurman in the dog house barely letting him play in the 4th quarter of pre-season games prior to his suspension his 2nd year. Not once has Marvin said Thurman was going to re-gain his starting job and return to his dominating ways. While he hoped he would, he was smart enough to know he could not count on it. That is why the team drafted Ahmad Brooks two years ago. It is also why Marvin let Thurman go at the first sign of trouble. While the timing of this move sounds bad, I sincerely doubt Thurman’s departure was about missing a few voluntary workouts.
While there is some negative publicity for cutting Thurman shortly after his grandmother’s funeral and after missing some voluntary workouts, but it sure beats cutting him after he has been arrested again or fails another drug test. Believe me if the team thought Thurman could be salvaged they would not have cut him.
If the team wants to make a positive out of a negative they should pick up the phone and make amends with former Bengal linebacker Takeo Spikes. A spot in the rotation would appear open for Spikes to return as a part-time player. While he is no longer the Pro Bowl player he once was, Spikes would fill the team’s biggest need - an emotional locker room leader. Despite the presence of a young group of linebackers, leadership on defense is in short supply. Last time I checked Spikes was a good character guy as well. Of course, Bengals.com has been quick to squelch this possibility.
By the way, while drafting Sedrick Ellis would have filled the team’s biggest defensive need, the consolation prize of LB Keith Rivers and DT Pat Sims is looking even better now.






2 Responses to “Bengals Cut Odell Thurman For Missing Voluntary Workouts???”
May 20th, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Lewis needs to look into the mirror for the problem. Way too many risks taken with flawed personalities over the past few years, and it continues as we speak.
I think it is an arrogance on his part, (similar to Al Davis) believing that he can take the most undisciplined characters and turn them into model citizens by sheer force of good intention.
May 20th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
Criticize Marvin all you want for the Chris Henry and Odell Thurman picks which have clearly blown up in his face but I respectfully disagree with people saying the team continues to take too many risks is assembling his roster.
The team has avoid taking character risks in the early rounds the past 2 years and the team has not signed any veteran free agents with character flaws. Critics will point toward 5th round pick Jason Shirley and undrafted free agent Maurice Purify but neither play has much $$$ invested in them and will be on a zero tolerance policy. The late rounds and undrafted free agent ranks are where you can take a chance on a shaky talent.
While i want the team to improve its character I don’t think they have to have a team of Boy Scouts either. But if you don’t invest big $$$ in your character risks, you have the leverage to discipline and/or cut them.
Adding a vocal team leader to the locker room would help improve the issues as well. For as nice a guys as Willie, Carson, Reggie Kelly, Rudi, and John Thornton are none are vocal leaders like Kitna or Boomer.
Final thought, why aren’t the Cowboys being criticized for taking character risks like Tank Johnson and Pac Man Jones. Along with Chris Henry those are two of the three players most responsible for the new discipline policy. Don’t rule out them signing Henry either.
Leave a comment