MVN: Most Valuable Network

#1

Posted by mikeinny, September 7, 2008 7:28 AM

every team that plays oakland this year all know the same thing on offense !

RUN AT BOTH THEIR ENDS !!!!

same as last year, just more of it!!! go look at the film vs jags / vikes / pack etc !!! re- le- over & over !!!!now this year it is even worse for RYANS' LAME D!

burgess / jrich / scott / edwards at the end spots ??

kelly / warren / sands at the 2 tackle spots ?? kelly is good, strong vs run , and gives a quik 1st step on pass rush . but it aint enuff !!!

warren is syMpt omatic!

plays in 12 out of 16 games, of those 12 he will have 3 monster games, & the other 9 up & down!

sands is not a "STRONGSIDE"def tackle !!, he is a quik 1st step guy, @ 6-7 he needs to be rotated 30 plays game, at both S D E & W D T along with kelly !!

but RYAN dont know the importance of ROTATING , he will leave kelly- burgess-warren-out there to dry on every down !! getting their BUTTS KICKED !

ALSO ! where is the pass rush gonna come from !!!

kelly will be doubled on every down, till someone else shows some semblance of abilty !!! BURGESS' pass rush is nullified, being played every down !!! so WHERES' THE SACKS GONNA COME FROM ???

truth is we aint gonna have one AGAIN!!!

ALL THANX TO ROBRYAN!!!! he got no clue how to utilize talent, he got no clue how to create a pass rush !!! this guy has plundered the talent on this team for last 5 years & counting !!!

this year will be the all time worst !!! look for the following to occur early & often !!! on run plays 6.50 per att vs the ends 24 atts per game , rite there that is 156 yards per game, then 14 atts up the middle spread out from late 2nd qtr rite thru end of game !!

at average of 3.90 per att !!! for another 59yards a game !! do the math that is 215 YARDS allowed per game !!!! the other team will avoid throwing the ball vs nahmdi , huff , hall !!! why should they !!! they will , 1 time a quarter play action deep vs routt or wilson w/ the slot guy or te for 2 big plays a game !!! but in reality they will have all day to throw vs these great talents we got in secondary !!! cutler will have 8-9 seconds to throw everytime !!! no one can cover same guy for much more then 5-6 seconds !! so again do the math !! denver runs 38+ atts they only need to then pass another 24 atts to get to the 62 play count plateau 1st !! which every should know adds to to a VCTORY every time !! the first team to 62 plays @ + 2 turnovers or less wins everytime !!!!!

so HOW can oakland do it with this " ALBATROSS"

OF A DEF CORDINATOR ROBRYAN still there ???

the answer is the same now as it was since 2004 !

THEY CANT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what oak can do is get up 14-0 by end of 1st quarter every game, and have 23+ plays run by that time !!

now 2 things weigh against that !!

#1 this is tuff for anyone to do week in week out !! and oaks offense so far looks like a good one, but they START SLOW!! they are slow starting offense ! looks like they get cranked up by 1st possesion of 2nd qtr!!!

there offense will be a good one , unstoppable at

times! , but will never be one that can consistently play from behind week in week out !!

so look for oaks #'s on def to look like this # 29 thru 32 vs the run on atts /last on yards per att #27 ,

on pass rush i'll call it now !! 24 sacks !! thats it !!! 25 topps!! why?? well again dothe math,

a GOOD PASS RUSH will produce 1 sack every 10 atts , now teams will throw a max of 24 atts vs the formidable oak back 7 !! oak does not have a " GOOD PASS RUSH " there sack avg has been a lowly 1 sack every 16 atts in their best year 2005 &06 !!! so again do the math !!!!!

this is at best 25 sacks a game !!!!! and i dont see them gettin that much , kelly-7 burgess -10 max!!!! and that who else is there ???? they wont have enuff oppurtunity to unleash a nickle or dime package to get edwrads/scott / howard/ williams a shot at any more then 4 or 5 sacks for any one of them!!!

BUT DONT WORRY ALL U " ROBRYAN " fan club memebers , they will lead the league in the all important " YARDS ALLOWED PER GAME AVERAGE " OOHHH YEAH that is really important !!!

pass yards per game allowed !!!! yeah that is what all u ryan folk like to see!!! leading the league in somehting !!!

THAT IS LIKE THE GUY @ NITE CLUB THAT SHOW UP @ 10.00PM early & HITS ON 250 GIRLS BY 100 AM , AND FINALLY GETS THE FATTEST UGLIEST GIRL IN THE PLACE !!! and then says next morning " hell, at least i got laid "!!!!

u can already see RYAN laying the ground work for his past failures here !! " well we never had a offense " maybe now i can do somehting " this year !!! ive never seen or heard a coach blame the players & or blame his own offense so often & get away with it since , thats rite " BUDDYRYAN" his looser dad!!!! "buddy " was always a loser!!! the only year he won anything he had walter payton, mcmahon, otis wilson, hampton & ditka !! one time !!!and one time only !!! so to say robryan has good pedigree never has held water with me!!!

a simple using of burgess / williams / edwards @ weak side end ( or rite end 4 u amateurs) , and then rotating kelly- sands - & yeah due to default that no talent loser j richardson @ WDT,

then due to need thanks to bad cuts/draft we must go get one or two big SDT now !! to rotate w/ WARREN,etc @sdt!!

then @ SDE a rotation of sands, kelly, j richardson

will creste a balance / symetry balance vs the run !!!

the pass rush i would create a extra 22 sacks by simply using williams & burgess off weak corner / for a toal of 23 sacks there ! then kelly / sands will create 13 sacks @ wdt/sde!!

then dogging howard 10 times per game will yeild him at least 10+ sacks rite away !!! so again do the math rite there alone is 45 sacks !!!!!

for allu ryan clowns doubting me on this !!! one simple word of advice !!

your mans way gets me 27 SACKS IN 2007 with better talent in front 7 then we have now!!!!!

so my way is obviously the only answer with the talent we got now!!!! of course i wouldve brought in better then

trevor scott ?? & kalimba edwards ?? and oh yeah cant forget the briallint move of putting the "GREAT RICKY BROWN IN A STARTER !!!!

i'll call it now he is the next stu schweigert on this team , his presence on the field will lead to missed tackles, gaping holes and 2-4 20+yards runs per game !!! he aint strong vs run he cant cover a te or back coming out !!! so as a lbr what is he gooddat ?? well this guy reminds me of a guy they tried to make good in 97 "MIKE MORTON "

having brown start is like having only 10 guys on defense !!! kinda like STUEY !!! then throw in the time when jrichdson & trevor scott are on the field at same time as brown and what u have is this 8 players on d vs 11 on offense!!! so this looks like another fiasco in the making !!!!!

u will spend the whole year

thinking "

" any game now these guys will start playing harder"

" they need to get tuffer" etc!!! or my fav from last years' post clevland win-

" we dont have a prevent d , we just like to keep them in bounds " and the beaut !!!

" my wife even said it , they cant tackle "

and of course the" new ryan5.0 version " well al is really running this defense, cause lombardi said he calls down to the sidelines" , anyone ever think that maybe he calls cause he is 75+ years of age , jerryjones, blanc, snyder etc are on the sidelines every game browbeating the coaches !! this fact of davis calling is irrelevant !!!! it really is !!

so look here u dopes !!! dont attack me !!! dont challenge me your moronic banter!!! just keep saying to yourself your ROBRYAN DEFENSE is a lemon / fraud / sham etc !!! dont u even dare refer to this LEMON OF A D as the RAIDER D !!!! OK !!!

oh & ps !! 4 years u & everyone like u blamed al davis for the " 60's " offense ! the vertical offense !!! etc !!rememebr that !!! now u want to blame the ROBRYAN DEFENSE FIASCO on al davis cause u can no longer blame the offense!!!!!!!!!!!

well u aint RAIDER FOLK !!! U ARE ROBRYAN FOLK !!!!! ok DO U UNDERSTND !!!!!!! I'M NOT ASKING !!!!!!! I'M DICTATING!!!!!

with a real def cord & same personell my raiders are 11-5 @ worst & div winners !!!

with staus quo of " THEROBRYAN" they are 4-12 @best and a new head coach AGAIN !!!!!

Reply

#2

Posted by Raider Blues, September 7, 2008 7:36 AM

How do I follow that?

I just wanted to add The Retarded Donkey Beat Writer is cool!

I remember when that guy said that about you... Makes one wonder???

Let's be Masters of Monday Night again gentlemen!

Leaving for Qatar in a couple days!!!

Reply

#3

Posted by xobn1050, September 7, 2008 11:28 AM

Did you guy get to see Warren Sapp this morning on NFL Network. This guy just has followed the Lombardi route blasting the Raiders on the media. Maybe that is one of the conditions to have a gig on TV doing some commentary. he answered a fantasy question about who to pick as starting RB the dolphins R.Brown against the Jets or S.Young against the Raiders. He said clearly S.Young against the "weak" Raiders run defense. Come on Warren, you are biting the hand that fed you for a couple of years. The Raiders picked him when everybody knew he was washed up and he played DT looking to get sacks for his own numbers and didn't worry about his lane discipline and allowed all them yards himself with his poor play. Then he joined the people criticizing the J. Walker signing, how original Warren. Everybody knows that Warren is a darling for TV media, just ask the newspaper writers and see what they say about the way he treated them. Good riddance Raiders.

Reply

#4

Posted by LDizzle, September 7, 2008 5:35 PM

Rob you have a tough act to follow after how well Patrick represented the Nation on Papa Joe's radio show. Make us proud.

mikeinny is making novel comments in every article that have nothing to do with the article itself. I can't help but laugh that he is wasting his time pecking at the keyboard for an hour because no one is going to read what he put so much effort into. Effort certainly doesn't equal intelligence if this comment is anything like his last one.

xobn1050 that is a good point. Warren talks about the Raiders having a terrible run defense when it was at its worst when he was still on the line. And you nailed it that he was only concerned about padding his stats when he dropped all that weight last year and was only going for sacks. He didn't give half a shit about the Raiders winning. At least he is gone now and we know that Kelly wants to win and Gerard Warren always shows up for games against his former team.

Reply

#5

Posted by Bill, September 7, 2008 10:01 PM

BRING ON MONDAY ALREADY!!!!

Reply

#6

Posted by raidermomo64, September 7, 2008 11:08 PM

Man, that Mikeinny guy was pretty boring. Don't ever give him his own column. Damn that was boring, anyway Raiders 31-17 over the Broncs. RB's will tire there D and keep our D off as we will put 8 in the box often, or blitz an LB occasionally. WR's will be adequate and the TE will be the differance along w/our RB's as I already mentioned. Go RAiders!! 10-6

Reply

#7

Posted by silver&black88, September 8, 2008 9:28 AM

new fag on the block huh. mikeinny, you are the denver jackass equivalent of mike40whiner. only, he actually made points in his ramblings and had good grammar and spelling. seriously, if you are trying to present yourself as a retard good job. otherwise wait in line with the rest of the haters for your well-deserved ass kicking that the silver and black will deliver.

GO RAIDERS, KILL THE DONKEYS ON NATIONAL TV!!!!!

Reply