<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Green Bay Packers</title>
        <link>http://mvn.com/nfl/packers/</link>
        <description>Green Bay Packers community of blogs, video and audio</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Ted Thompson: Work To Do</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>What is a general manager to do when 15 players contracts are expiring at the end of the 2009 season and seven of them are starters. Out of those 15 free agents three have been to the Pro Bowl and one other is one of the most electrifying punt returners in the NFL. That is the issue Packers G.M. and VP of Player Personnel Ted Thompson has to deal with throughout this season and into next off season. And he thought the "Favre Saga" was  a pain in the rear end.</p>

<p>When asked about the issue, Thompson said "there is always an evolution of a team. At different points in poeples careers things happen. And we're trying to take care of our business the best we can." Thompson added "Each year your team matures, and we have a larger number of young guys that are getting ready for the next phase of their careers, and that's something that's our job to deal with."</p>

<p>The 15 players that have expiring contracts on the Packers are  Linebackers Aaron Kampman, Brandon Chillar, Safeties Nick Collins and Atari Bigby, Cornerbacks Will Blackmon and Tramon Williams, Offensive Linemen Daryn Colledge, Jason Spitz, Chad Clifton, Tony Moll, Defensive Linemen Ryan Pickett, Johnny Jolly, Wide Receiver Ruvell Martin, Tight End Tory Humphrey and Fullback John Kuhn.</p>

<p>A good example of that is the way Packers wide receiver Greg  Jennings and Packers safety Nick Collins have handled their contract situations with Thompson.</p>

<p>Jennings, who has been highly productive on the field and an even better person off of it, kept his negotiations private and said publicly that the Packers would do the right thing and he would not hold out. And on June 23rd Jennings got his big pay day when he signed a three year deal with $27 million dollars in "new money" and $16.25 in guaranteed money. Collins on the other hand made his first Pro Bowl last year after tying for the NFC lead with 7 interceptions and finally showingthe play making skills that made him the Packers second round pick in 2005 (the 51st overall selection). Collins has taken the opposite stance as Jennings by saying he would not rule out a hold out in order to get a new contract. Talks are currently on going and the hope is he will be in camp when it starts next month.</p>

<p>This will also be a key year for Aaron Kampman, who not only is in the final year of his deal, but also playing a new position, outside linbacker since the Packers switched their defense to a 3-4. Kampman has 37.5 sacks in the last three seasons and has been a leader on and off the field. He is the "key" to the Packers new defense because of his ability to rush the passer and how quick his transition to OLB may determine how much he gets paid. I don't see the Packers letting him go.</p>

<p>Daryn Colledge is a different story. He was the Packers most consistent linemen last year and according to may friends at packerupdate.com is the Packers number two priority this off season (behind Jennings).  Jason Spitz will take over at center for Scott Wells and also will get his pay day, but the same can not be said for long time Packers tackle Chad Clifton. Clifton is on the down side of his career and injury and age have caught up with him. I was told Packers would bring him back for a reduced price tag, some where around six million for two years.</p>

<p>The question is would he except that pay cut, my guess is no.<br />
Atari Bigby, Will Blackmon and Tramon Williams are all in the same boat to me. All three have showed flashes but either injury, in Bigby and Blackmon's case, or veterans playing a head of you in Williams case, has kept them off the field. Williams will get the most money of the three because the Packers look at him a future starter. Bigby needs to show the Packers he can remain healthy and cover while Blackmon also needs to stay on the field, not just because of injury, but coverage ability as well.</p>

<p>Ryan Pickett and Johnny Jolly are interesting scenarios because of age (Pickett) and leagal issues (Jolly). Pickett, who will be 30 this year, has been everything the packers wanted and more since they signed him away from the Rams four years ago. The new defense, along with first round pick B.J. Raji, will make Pickett an even bigger force in the middle of the defensive line. Jolly, who is facing a 4 game suspension for possesing over 200 grams of codeine and a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, is in a position to take a little less form the Packers because of his leagal issues. I suspect both will be back.</p>

<p>I would say Clifton, Scott Wells, John Kuhn, Humphrey, Martin and possibly Bigby are the players that are in their last days as a Packer and Thompson resigning the rest.</p>

<p>Ted Thompson has the Packers in a position of strength with their salary cap situation. He is a GM that plans a head, and one has to think he knew this day would come. I dare to say that this is a position most GM's would want to be in, having to resign the young talent they have amassed by shrewed drafting and free agent moves. Thompson's job is to bring the Lombardi Trophy back home to Green Bay, and he is building this team for that exact goal as well as be competitive for a long there after. He has the money to do so, now it's time to go to work.</p>

<p><em><a href="http://mail.google.com/a/?page_id=387&aid=33">Joe Arrigo</a> is a Staff writer for <a href="http://PackerChatters.com">PackerChatters.com</a>.</p>

<p>Visit Joe's blog - <a href="http://joeslockerroom.wordpress.com/">Joe's Locker Room</a> - for more good reading</em></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://mvn.com/community/2009/07/ted-thompson-work-to-do.html</link>
            <guid>http://mvn.com/community/2009/07/ted-thompson-work-to-do.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Green Bay Packers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:55:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Packers&apos; Best Running Back Is Not Who You Think</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>In any discussion I've seen of the current Green Bay Packers running backs, the theme is the same; Can Ryan Grant return to the form of his rookie year and if not, will they finally give Brandon Jackson a chance to start?</p>

<p>In a recent interview, Greg Bedard of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel was asked why Brandon Jackson did not get more of an opportunity to play last year, Bedard stated without hesitation that there were people in the Packer organization that wanted Ryan Grant to be the starter last year, even as he was struggling on the field and battling a hamstring injury.</p>

<p>All indications are that it wasn't the coaches, but the Packers front office pushing Grant as the starter to justify the new contract he was given.</p>

<p>So as Packer fans continue arguing Grant vs Jackson, I am here to throw a monkey wrench into the debate. Neither one of them is the best running back on the Packers. Lurking in the wings and waiting for his chance could very well be the best running back on the Green Bay Packers roster--Kregg Lumpkin.</p>

<p>As a running back from the University of Georgia, Kregg Lumpkin is in good company. Herschel Walker, Terrell Davis, Rodney Hampton, Garrison Hearst and other top NFL running backs have all came out of "Tailback U".</p>

<p>Lumpkin was expected to have as good a college career as any of them. But that didn't happen. Lumpkin made the Packers roster as an undrafted rookie, and then ended up spending most of the season on injured reserve.</p>

<p>So what has he done for me to say he is the Packers' best running back? Why would I go out on such a precarious limb? What evidence is there to support this hypothesis? Well, a lot of it may be circumstantial, but let me present my case.</p>

<p>Kregg Antonio Lumpkin was born in Albany, Georgia, about 60 miles North of Tallahassee, Florida. His family later  relocated to Stone Mountain Georgia, a suburb of Atlanta. Lumpkin played High School football there  at Stephenson HS.</p>

<p>He started all four year at running back, and rushed for 2,088 yards during his junior season and 1,456 yards with 15 touchdowns as a senior.</p>

<p>Lumpkin was a Parade All-American and named the number one overall HS recruit from the State of Georgia. He was also ranked as the second best running back prospect in the entire nation, second only to some kid named Reggie Bush.</p>

<p>With those credentials and a 4.4 40-yard dash time, Lumpkin was recruited by top football programs like the Univ. of Miami and the Univ. of Florida.  But those programs had little chance of landing him. Lumpkin chose to stay close to home and committed to the University of Georgia, less than an hour away.</p>

<p>In 2003, as a true freshman at Georgia, Lumpkin played in 12 games and finished as the team's second leading rusher with 523 yards on 112 carries. But he missed the first two games with a hamstring injury, and fought it the rest of the year, starting a pattern of physical problems.</p>

<p>That pattern continued the next year. After being name "Most Improved Running back" at Spring practice, Lumpkin came to training camp ready to win the starting tailback position. That quest lasted about an hour, as he suffered a season-ending ACL injury in the first practice and was put on medical re-shirt for 2004.</p>

<p>Lumpkin battled back from that serious injury to play in the 2005, season, albeit in a part-time role. He appeared in 13 games, but was used carefully and sparingly, gaining 335 yards on the season, while averaging 5.1 yards per carry.</p>

<p>In 2006, his 3rd year of college football, Lumpkin started nine games at tailback, rushing for 800 yards and 6 TDs, while averaging 4.9 yards per carry. This was also the year he started to show his soft hands and pass-catching skills, pulling in 17 passes on the year.</p>

<p>Lumpkin was primed and ready for his senior season. Listed as the #1 Tailback, Lumpkin played in only five games due to a broken right thumb, the arrival of Knowshon Moreno and then another serious injury to his left knee, once again requiring season-ending injury.</p>

<p>Lumpkin evidently made the most of all his time on the injury list. He concentrated on his studies and graduated with dual B.S. degrees in consumer economics and housing.</p>

<p>With his inability to stay on the field as well as a poor 40 time at the NFL Combine (4.64), Lumpkin's name was not called in the 2008 NFL Draft. But the Packers' southeast scout, Brian Gutekunst, college scouting director John Dorsey and general manager Ted Thompson all liked what they had seen of him. After the draft,  quickly signed Lumpkin to the team as an undrafted free agent.</p>

<p>During preseason, Lumpkin got an opportunity to show what he could do and made the most of it. He finished the preseason as the Packers leading rusher (38 carries, 153 yards, 4.0-yard average, one touchdown) and also added seven receptions for 59 yards and another TD.</p>

<p>The Packers were so impressed with Lumpkin that they cut three veteran running backs (Noah Herron, DeShawn Wynn and Vernand Morency) and kept Lumpkin as the No. 3 Running Back. the Packers coaches were sure they had themselves a real find.</p>

<p>Head coach Mike McCarthy said, "He runs physical. He continues to improve. He breaks tackles. He's a better player when he gets past the line of scrimmage than I originally thought. As he gets more comfortable, you see the physicality of his play has increased. I thought he did some good things."</p>

<p>McCarthy later added, "Lumpkin is a perfect example of what you're looking for in a rookie. I think talent-wise, he brings a lot to the table, and he's improved every week. That's what you're looking for in rookies, to take advantage of their opportunity. He's put together a nice training camp."</p>

<p>Offensive coordinator Joe Philbin said the 5-foot-11, 228-pound Lumpkin is "a pretty good fit for this system, with his style of running. He's not a real dancer, he's got a little bit of straight-line (speed), which I think fits us well. He's got nice size, he's a good-looking guy in pads. He looks like a running back. He's got some good attributes, no question... He's certainly produced when he's been in there."</p>

<p>Lumpkin was ecstatic to make the Packers roster, but expected it. "I don't think I've surprised myself," said Lumpkin, "I feel confident in what I'm doing."</p>

<p>With Ryan Grant and Brandon Jackson nursing injuries going into game 2 vs Detroit, Lumpkin got a lot of work in practice that week with the No. 1 offense. While both Grant and Jackson were expected to play, the Packers were not worried if Lumpkin had to be pressed into service.</p>

<p>"I think he could handle it all," coach Mike McCarthy told reporters in Green Bay. "He's done a very good job with his opportunities."</p>

<p>Grant and Jackson did play, but the Packers still got Lumpkin some playing time and he did well. He carried the ball once for nineteen yards and caught 3 passes for 22 yards. After the game Coach McCarthy said that Kregg Lumpkin "absolutely" earned more playing time going forward with his Week 2 effort.</p>

<p>But alas, the injury bug would hit once again. Lumpkin suffered a hamstring injury in practice and spent the next three weeks trying to come back, but to no avail. The Packers finally decided they need a healthy No. 3 running back on the roster, so they put Lumpkin on the injured reserve list and called up DeShawn Wynn from the Practice Squad. Once again, Lumpkin's season came to an early end.</p>

<p>So now that you know the Kregg Lumpkin story, you can see it is one of disappointment and unrealized potential. Admittedly, there isn't a lot of cold hard evidence to go by. But I do remember watching him in pre-Season last year and being really impressed. I remember thinking at that time, without knowing a thing about him, "this kid is going to make the team".</p>

<p>What did I like about him? He is a North-South runner that runs hard, low to the ground and is tough to bring down. Unlike Ryan Grant, runs with his head up and has great vision.</p>

<p>Unlike Brandon Jackson, he picks his hole quickly and has the ability to drive the pile. He also has soft hands as a receiver and has proven he has the ability to pass protect. The only thing he lacks is breakaway speed, but the Packers don't exactly design their offense for the 60 yard run anyway.</p>

<p>As described earlier in this article, the Packers coaches like what they've seen of Lumpkin. They see him as the move-the-chains type running back their offense calls for.I have also studied video of him at Georgia. He always seems to make the most of every run, and has been a consistent 5 yard-per-carry guy.</p>

<p>The big question of course, is, can he stay healthy? While there is no historical evidence to make you think he will, there is reason for hope. That hope lies in the Packers' Strength and Conditioning Hall of Fame coach, Dave "Red-Man" Redding.</p>

<p>Red-Man is an old-schooler, prefers the free weights over machines, is a motivator and is most concerned with keeping players on the field. Here is how Redding describes his philosophy:</p>

<p>"I don't care what they can max out at," he said. "I don't care what they can do 10 times at a max load. I'm here to weight train them to make them better football players. This is not about how much we lift. It's about how healthy we can stay and how well we can play throughout the year."</p>

<p>Beautiful.</p>

<p>While the Packer Organization would prefer Ryan Grant to live up to the big contract they awarded him, a healthy Lumpkin has consistently caught the eye of the Packers coaches.</p>

<p>If he can stay healthy, perhaps as the year progresses he will earn a share of the carries, especially if Grant struggles once again. At the very least, he may steal some snaps from Brandon Jackson.</p>

<p>Kregg Lumpkin could be the best running back on the Green Bay Packers. I know it's a big leap of faith, a roll of the dice and a lot of "IFs". But it's my feeling and I'm sticking with it.</p>

<p>In his appropriately-named poem "IF", Rudyard Kipling writes:</p>

<p>"If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, but make allowance for their doubting too."</p>

<p>If you think I'm crazy, Packer fans, it's okay, I'll understand.</p>

<p><em><a href="http://www.packerchatters.com/about_us/site_staff/view.php?id=69">Al Bracco</a> is a Staff Op/Ed Writer for <a href="http://wisportsonline.com/">Wisconsin Sports Online</a>.</p>

<p>Visit Al's blog, <a href="http://jerseyalgbp.blogspot.com/">Jersey Al's Blog</a>, for more interesting articles.</em></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://mvn.com/community/2009/07/packers-best-running-back-is-not-who-you-think.html</link>
            <guid>http://mvn.com/community/2009/07/packers-best-running-back-is-not-who-you-think.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Green Bay Packers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:52:02 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>NFL Top 10:  The Best Offseason Moves Not Made</title>
            <description><![CDATA[We tend to judge coaches by how their actions effect games.&nbsp; We tend to judge front office types by their acquisitions.&nbsp; These are fair game of course, but the best offseason moves are often the ones that weren't made.<br /><br />In today's NFL Top 10 column, we'll take a look back at all aspects of the offseason, and narrow down just ten player personnel moves that were not made, and how the discussed party is much better off.<br /><br /><b>10.&nbsp; The Detroit Lions pass on an offensive lineman in the first round of the NFL Draft<br /></b>This is coming from a man who thinks that Jason Smith should have been the pick at No. 1, the prior Lions regime might have decided that after taking Matthew Stafford at No. 1, the No. 20 pick should have been the best lineman available.&nbsp; And even with OT Michael Oher available, the Lions decided that TE Brandon Pettigrew was a more irreplaceable player, and snagged him.&nbsp; In the running game, he's basically another offensive tackle.&nbsp; The Lions decided that even if their pass blocking struggles again this year, they still have plenty of options going forward to address it.&nbsp; The team has extended the contracts of two interior lineman this year, so once you pass on that franchise LT, they were better off going the developmental prospect route, which they did. <b>&nbsp; <br /><br />9.&nbsp; The 49ers do not go out and sign/draft a quarterback<br /></b>This would have been a very defensible move if it happened, but they aren't a) one QB away from contending, or b) in a position where they can cast off any of the current crew without risking losing your potential franchise QB.&nbsp; The shine is off of Alex Smith, but we're still not real sure what, if anything, he is.&nbsp; The thing about Shaun Hill is that you can put the ball in his hands for the time being if no one else steps up, and he won't embarrass himself.&nbsp;&nbsp; And the 49ers were one of the few teams who took advantage of a QB class that was far deeper than it was strong, landing Nate Davis in the 5th round.&nbsp; Davis could be a potential franchise player if he can overcome a learning disability that scared away most NFL teams.&nbsp; It makes sense to give Singletary a season to see if he can get his team to the doorstep of the playoffs before you worry about the <i>next</i> QB of the 49ers.<br /><b><br />8.&nbsp; Marc Tauscher was not signed in the free agency rush<br /></b>Tauscher, a right tackle who was coming off his worst season, not to mention a mid year-ending knee injury, was supposed to be one of the first OTs off the market in March this year.&nbsp; Given his health and declining play, a multi year contract would have been disastrous for the team that took the risk.&nbsp; Tauscher is much better served as a player on a one year deal this year.&nbsp; He remains unsigned, so he'll be allowed to rehab at his own pace, maybe even sit out the 2009 season, and get back on the field next year or in the middle of the season and he can hopefully contribute to someone's playoff push.<br /><b><br />7.&nbsp; The Philadelphia Eagles do not match Denver's offer to Brian Dawkins<br /></b>Denver just gave Brian Dawkins a lot of money for his age 36, 37, and 38 seasons.&nbsp; We all know how big a part of the Eagles defensive units he has been, but we also know how quickly these older players can become a weak link on their own units.&nbsp; The aspirations are too high for the Eagles this year to offer Dawkins more than they believe he is worth to them, and then to put his satisfaction before the team.&nbsp; I'm not at all suggesting Dawkins is a selfish player, just that he's human, and he's worth more to Denver right now than he is to the Eagles.<br /><b><br />6.&nbsp; N</b><b>namdi Asomugha does not bolt a bad situation in Oakland<br /></b>The Raiders may be a total laughingstock, but they could have easily let a mismanaged situation turn into the loss of their best player, CB Nnamdi Asomugha.&nbsp; But the Raiders did the right thing, they stuck to their guns, didn't extend their top player for longer than they were comfortable (the deal is three years) and compensated him like the best defensive player in football, which he just might be.&nbsp; These trade offs have bitten the Raiders in the past, but they avoided a Doomsday scenario with some shrewd negotiations.<br /><b><br />5.&nbsp; Ray Lewis stays with the Ravens<br /></b>The Ravens would have been okay letting their leader walk, but considering that they were willing to offer 8 million dollars per year to the pro bowl linebacker, it would have been unfathomable if Ray had spurned them and gone elsewhere.&nbsp; Because of the legend that Lewis roles with, and the fact that the Ravens are on the verge of something special, it would have been just weird had the team played deep into the playoffs to have Ray sitting and watching from his couch.<br /><b><br />4.&nbsp; The Ravens don't overpay for Jason Brown<br /></b>About four days before free agency began, contract negotiations between the Baltimore Ravens and Center Jason Brown stalled, and Brown publicly criticized the team in leaving them.&nbsp; He got the money he was looking for for the Rams, but ultimately Brown loses out.&nbsp; For less money, the team brought in pro bowl C Matt Birk from Minnesota, who was also being lowballed, and used their first round selection to draft an offensive lineman, Ole Miss' Michael Oher.&nbsp; If they had gone over the top for Brown, I'm not sure those moves are possible, and Birk would still be a Viking.<br /><b><br />3.&nbsp; The Browns don't sell low on Braylon Edwards<br /></b>Yes, his year last year was horrific.&nbsp; Which is all the more reason not to go and trade him.&nbsp; The Browns are a team that needs to hoard their talent right now, not deal it.&nbsp; This is especially true since the team decided that Kellen Winslow was too much of a cancer, and sent him to Tampa for a second round pick.&nbsp; Losing Edwards and Winslow in the same offseason might have handicapped the Browns a bit too much, so by choosing to move Winslow, keeping Edwards became the right move, and allows Edwards to re-establish himself in 2009. <br /><b><br />2.&nbsp; The Redskins do not replace Jason Campbell<br /></b>The one move this year that could have easily been an unmitigated disaster was the proposed three team deal between the Bucs, the Redskins, and the Broncos that would have sent Campbell to Tampa for a second round pick in 2010, and Jay Cutler to the Redskins for two firsts.&nbsp; Cutler would have found himself in a Vanderbilt-like offense with only one competent target and a declining defense.&nbsp; Instead, the Redskins invested in a pass rusher and a cornerback in the 2009 draft, and now have young reinforcements to help out an aging starting defense.&nbsp; The offense is better off as well.&nbsp; Cutler and Campbell don't play the same game, and Campbell's the one who may win more games this year going forward.<br /><b><br />1.&nbsp; The Cardinals don't lose an integral part of the 2008 NFL runner-up team<br /></b>Between Bertrand Berry, Karlos Dansby, Anquan Boldin, Adrian Wilson, and Kurt Warner, and the limited amount of cap space the team had, it's amazing that they've kept all of those parts, have extended Wilson, are close with Dansby, and have made all moves without jeopardizing the team's ability to improve itself elsewhere, via the draft (Beanie Wells) and free agency (Bryant McFadden).&nbsp; It's a remarkable adjustment from the same old Cardinals talk that had flooded airwaves when they let Kurt Warner take a cursory tour of the Niners practice facility.&nbsp; But much more importantly, it gives the current group another go at it, without having to spend a critical season or two replacing the talent lost.&nbsp; This was the very best offseason move not made.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://mvn.com/outsider/2009/06/nfl-top-10-the-best-offseason-moves-not-made.html</link>
            <guid>http://mvn.com/outsider/2009/06/nfl-top-10-the-best-offseason-moves-not-made.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">NFL</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Arizona Cardinals</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Baltimore Ravens</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cleveland Browns</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Detroit Lions</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Green Bay Packers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL Top 10</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Oakland Raiders</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Philadelphia Eagles</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">San Francisco 49ers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Washington Redskins</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Five Keys to the Packers Returning to the Playoffs</title>
            <description><![CDATA[On ESPN's NFL Live Monday, June 29, 2009, both analysts (Cris Carter and James Hasty) said Green Bay was the non-playoff team from 2008 most likely to make the playoffs in 2009. There are few times a 6-10 team can enter the next season as a team that is widely considered a contender to not only make the playoffs, but win their division. <br /><br />But the Packers outplayed their division rivals head-to-head, going no worse than 1-1 against any team and outscoring all three. They also have the history of dominating their division, winning seven of the last 14 titles.<br /><br />Plus, with the NFL's parity, it is not unheard of, either. Last season was the first in the short history of the NFC South that the last-place team did not win the division the next year (other than the first season of the division, with no incumbent last-place team).<br /><br />However, all three other teams in the NFC North have improved in the off-season. Therefore, the Packers need some things to fall in place to make the playoffs; here are the top five keys to the Packers returning to the post-season:<br /><br /><b>1. Can the Packers' young offensive line hold together?</b> <br /><br />There are several players the Packers are looking to step up and either take over a starting position or elevate their game to the level it needs to be. Among those who were not on the field last season are T.J. Lang and Breno Giacomini, and others who may be in the mix for starting are Tony Moll, Allen Barbre, Jason Spitz, Josh Sitton, and Daryn Colledge. Incumbents Scott Wells and Chad Clifton struggled with injuries and may lose their spots if they are not healthy this season.<br /><br /><b>2. How quickly can the Packers defense adjust to the new 3-4 system?</b> <br /><br />The Packers will have three players with new responsibilities, the most drastic being Pro Bowl defensive end Aaron Kampman moving to outside linebacker (where he has not played since college). But either DE Jeremy Thompson or 4-3 outside linebackers Brady Poppinga or Clay Matthews III (a rookie) will play the other spot, and Johnny Jolly or Justin Harrell will be moving from the inside to play end.<br /><br /><b>3. Will Pat and Kevin Williams have their suspensions reduced by a favourable Minnesota court?</b> <br /><br />Both players were able to play at the end of last season as a Minnesota court conveniently ruled their suspensions should be delayed for an investigation. This was almost unprecedented, and could be repeated as the final decision is once again in the hands of a court within the team's fan base. If the four games are reduced, the two will be available when the Packers come to town.<br /><br /><b>4. Will Brett Favre be healthy and if he is, how quickly will he acquire chemistry with his new teammates?</b> <br /><br />Favre has struggled mightily at the end of the past four seasons, throwing just 15 TDs and 39 picks in the 17 games from Thanksgiving on. But Favre is a definite upgrade over Tarvaris Jackson or Sage Rosenfels. If he clicks as quickly in Minnesota as he did in New York last season, the Vikings can win in week four even without the Williams Tackle Tandem.<br /><br /><b>5. How much of a difference will Jay Cutler make for the Chicago Bears?</b> <br /><br />Cutler will not likely have a Brandon Marshall-quality receiver to throw to for the Bears, who have no receivers on their roster who could even crack the Packers top-four. This could mean Cutler struggles to perform at a much higher level than Kyle Orton did in 2008, but if the Bears can get significantly more out of the quarterback position than they did last year (a 9-7 season), they are probably in the playoffs, making the Packers that much less likely to earn a birth.<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://mvn.com/thefrozentundra/2009/06/five-keys-to-the-packers-returning-to-the-playoffs.html</link>
            <guid>http://mvn.com/thefrozentundra/2009/06/five-keys-to-the-packers-returning-to-the-playoffs.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">NFC North battles</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Power Rankings</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prediction</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Regular Season</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Training Camp</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Chicago Bears</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ESPN</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Green Bay Packers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Minnesota Vikings</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFC North</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL Live</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>NFL Outsider 2009 Season Preview: Green Bay Packers</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><em><span class="caps">NFL</span> Outsider is hosting a season preview of all 32 teams. The <span class="caps">NFL </span>regular season begins on September 10; in the meantime follow the best <span class="caps">NFL </span>bloggers as they analyze their teams in this 2009 season preview.<br /><br />Bob Fox from <a href="http://packerchatters.com/">PackerChatters.com</a> and <a href="http://wisportsonline.com/">Wisconsin Sports Online</a> gives insight into what to expect from this year's <a href="http://mvn.com/nfl/packers">Green Bay Packers</a>.</em><br /><br />The 2009 Green Bay Packers have made some big changes as they prepare for the upcoming season.&nbsp; The 2008 Packer squad was let down by the defensive shortcomings and by issues on special teams.<br /><br />Because of that, head coach Mike McCarthy made several changes to his coaching staff, mostly on the defensive side of the ball, as he hired Dom Capers to be his new defensive coordinator.&nbsp; Capers brings with him the 3-4 defensive scheme, an excellent track record and a energetic coaching staff.<br /><br />The Packers have to try and reverse the problems that the 2008 Packer defense had, namely stopping the run, rushing the passer and allowing big plays late in games.&nbsp; The Packers were ranked 20th overall in team defense in 2008.<br /><br />McCarthy also made a change on special teams, as former special teams coordinator Mike Stock retired, and McCarthy named Shawn Slocum the new coordinator.<br /><br />The Packers were one of the best special team units in the <span class="caps">NFL </span>in 2007, but fell back towards the latter portion of the league in 2008 because of a shaky punting game, returning kickoffs and covering kickoffs.<br /><br />The Packers finished 6-10, but it was sort of an anomaly, as the Pack scored 419 points and allowed 380 points.&nbsp; The reason the season wasn't more successful was because in eight of the 10 losses, the Packers led or were behind by no more than one score in the 4th quarter.<br /><br /><b>Free agency and the draft</b><br /><br />General Manager Ted Thompson was his usual non-active self in free agency in 2009.&nbsp; The Packers only signed S Anthony Smith, who knows the 3-4 defense quite well from his days with the Pittsburgh Steelers, and also OL Duke Preston, formerly of the Buffalo Bills, to be another option in the offensive line.<br /><br />The Packers also lost DT Colin Cole to free agency, and it also looks like OT Mark Tauscher will not return as well.<br /><br />As usual, Thompson made his biggest impact on the Packers in the 2009 <span class="caps">NFL </span>draft.&nbsp; A lot of observers think he had a very solid draft again.<br /><br />The Packers selected DL <span class="caps">B.J.</span> Raji and <span class="caps">OLB</span> Clay Matthews in the 1st round.&nbsp; Both are expected to pay immediate returns in 2009.&nbsp; The Packers then followed those choices with OL <span class="caps">T.J.</span> Lang, FB Quinn Johnson, OL Jamon Meredith, DE Jarius Wynn, DB Brandon Underwood and <span class="caps">OLB</span> Brad Jones.<br /><br /><b>The roster, position by position</b><br /><br />One of the keys for the 2009 season will be the continued maturation of Rodgers at QB.&nbsp; Rodgers needs to come up bigger late in games, but he did not throw a single interception in the red zone in 2008, while throwing 19 of his 28 TD passes in the red zone.&nbsp; That is a excellent sign.<br /><br />Rodgers also led the NFL with 16 40-plus yard completions.&nbsp; The Packer wide receivers are excellent, led by Greg Jennings and Donald Driver, but I think that Rodgers will get even more help from guys like Jordy Nelson and Jermichael Finley based on what they have done in recent workouts.<br /><br />The running game will need to be more like 2007, when Ryan Grant was breaking off more big runs.&nbsp; But with no contract issues outstanding now, the Packers expect Grant to perform better, even though he had over 1,200 yards rushing in 2008.<br /><br />Grant will be pushed by guys like Brandon Jackson, DeShawn Wynn and the younger backs.&nbsp; Rookie Quinn Johnson is expected to help as well, as he is a punishing lead blocker.<br /><br />The real key to the success of the Packers in 2009, will be an improvement in both defense and special teams.<br /><br />The quicker that the Packers can learn the 3-4 defensive scheme and make it effective, the better the chances for the team to be a force again in the NFC North division.<br /><br />Some are worried about the change for Aaron Kampman as he has moved from LDE to LOLB in the 3-4, but I think Kampman will be fine, thanks to the tutoring of LB coach Kevin Greene.<br /><br />Both Nick Barnett and A.J. Hawk have to play up to their talents in 2009, and put the injury issues of 2008 behind them.&nbsp; I look for Jeremy Thompson and Matthews to have a spirited battle for the ROLB position.<br /><br />The DL has to play much better in 2009.&nbsp; Justin Harrell has to finally show that he is worthy of being a 1st round pick.&nbsp; Cullen Jenkins was having a nice year in 2008 before he was hurt.&nbsp; I think Jenkins will return to form.<br /><br />Pickett will play the nose in the 3-4, but also play some DE.&nbsp; The same goes for Raji.&nbsp; Raji will be the difference maker in the line, but he needs help from everyone in the trenches, especially from a guy like Harrell.<br /><br />The secondary will also see some changes in philosophy, as the press coverage they played so often in the past, will now be mostly zone coverage.&nbsp; But the talent is there.&nbsp; In abundance.&nbsp; Both Charles Woodson, Al Harris&nbsp;and Nick Collins went to the Pro Bowl in 2008.<br /><br />I look for Atari Bigby to return to his 2007 form as the 3-4 scheme is perfect for his abilities.&nbsp; Collins needs to get his contract situation figured out, but he is becoming the player the Packers thought he would be when the Packers drafted him in the 2nd round in 2005.<br /><br />Al Harris and Woodson should be fine on the corners, even though some think Harris will be hurt by the lack of press coverage.&nbsp; If Harris does falter, then Tramon Williams is waiting in the wings.<br /><br />The Packer special teams have to get better as well, especially at the punting position.&nbsp; The Derrick Frost experiment in 2008 was a disaster.&nbsp; The Packers need Durant Brooks or Jeremy Kapinos to be much more consistent.<br /><br />The Packers need to cover kicks better as well, and the additional depth of linebackers in the 3-4 scheme will help that situation.<br /><br />The punt return unit is in fine hands with Blackmon, but kickoff returns have to get better.&nbsp; Blackmon and Nelson were the main returners in 2008.<br /><br /><b>NFC North in 2009</b><br /><br />Bottom line, the NFC North might just be the most interesting division in the NFL in 2009.&nbsp; The Bears added QB Jay Cutler.&nbsp; It appears that the Vikings will be adding Brett Favre as a QB.&nbsp; The Detroit Lions are going forward with a new QB in Matt Stafford, and no longer have Matt Millen running things.<br /><br />I look for the Packers to be right in the mix in the NFC North race, as they have nice talent and a very favorable early schedule.&nbsp; The offense will be fine and I expect improvement from both the defense and special teams.<br /><br />It will be a very tough divisional battle, as the Packers open the 2009 season at home vs. the Bears and play both games against the Vikings in the first half of the season.<br /><br />I see the Packers at 10-6 or perhaps even 11-5 in 2009 and winning an NFC North championship.&nbsp; It won't be easy, nor will the playoffs be easy if the Packers get there.&nbsp; But as the Arizona Cardinals proved in 2008, the NFC is there for the taking.<a href="http://http//mvn.com/outsider/2009/06/nfl-outsider-2009-season-preview-green-bay-packers-continued.html"><br /></a></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://mvn.com/outsider/2009/06/nfl-outsider-2009-season-preview-green-bay-packers.html</link>
            <guid>http://mvn.com/outsider/2009/06/nfl-outsider-2009-season-preview-green-bay-packers.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">NFL</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Season Preview</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Aaron Rodgers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Green Bay Packers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:20:00 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Minnesota Vikings: Don&apos;t Get Brett Favre, Tarvaris Jackson Is The Answer</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<h3 class="post-title entry-title">
</h3>

<div class="post-body entry-content">
<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bleacherreport.com/images_root/image_pictures/0444/1632/t-jax_feature.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 358px; height: 243px;" src="http://bleacherreport.com/images_root/image_pictures/0444/1632/t-jax_feature.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Brett
Favre is surely going to be the on the Minnesota Vikings roster, now
that he is gotten surgery on his throwing shoulder and a Vikings
assistant will be coming to Favre to do some workouts with him to help
his shoulder. <p>So, you get it: Favre will obviously be on the Vikings roster, no doubt.</p> <p>I don't know what's next for Favre after he leaves Minnesota, because he will after one year and go on to <a href="http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/19284/Brett-Favre-Podium.jpg">these teams</a>.</p> <p>So
here's my question to all of you fans for the NFL team in the purple
uniform: why would you want a losing-his-luster quarterback like Brett
Favre for one year, when you can get an improving quarterback like
Tarvaris Jackson for many years to come?</p> <p>Why Brad Childress, why?</p> <p>Have
you seen what Favre has done with the Jets. When the Jets were at an
8-3 record last year, they went 1-4 after that. In that span of five
games in which Favre didn't play well, you could see him just throwing
the ball up in the air.</p> <p>It turned out he didn't look like having
fun, not one single bit. He was just playing with negative attitude.
And you know the saying in sports that you have to bring "ten percent
effort and ninety percent attitude?"</p> <p>Well, Favre was zero percent in both of those categories, to be honest.</p> <p>There's
no point of having Brett Favre. Sure, he will be pretty good but he
might be ruining his legacy if he comes to Minnesota. He's already a
Hall-of-Famer, what's the point of keep playing.</p> <p>I know, Joe Gibbs did that when he was a coach, but that's coaching man! That's coaching!</p> <p>Brett
Favre might as well play for all 32 NFL teams. But there is some good
bringing Favre to Minnesota. A good writer on this site (one of my
favorites), James Williamson, has said something that was very
interesting if Favre came to Minnesota.</p> <p>Williamson observed that Favre will be the first ever quarterback in NFL history to beat all 32 NFL teams!</p> <p>Pretty sweet, huh?</p> <p>But seriously, that's not the point!</p> <p>Now you'll see Sage Rosenfels swapping faces. If you don't get what I am saying,<a href="http://abitoutside.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/murder.jpg"> please take a look</a>. </p><p>But also, what's the point having Rosenfels, too?</p> <p>You all remember his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3_hi7gOjE0">helicopter hurdle</a>
against the Indianapolis Colts last year that cost Houston the win (And
Schaub's smiling face. His face when Rosenfels fumbled is priceless!).</p> <p>And
Rosenfels second battle against the Colts when he costs Houston a win
(again) when he was looking for a receiver and then just decided to
throw right at Colts' safety, Melvin Bullit.</p> <p>Rosenfels will create a problem in Minnesota, I guarantee it (don't go Joe Namath now!). But here is what the Vikings should do:</p> <p><strong>USE TARVARIS JACKSON!!!!</strong></p> <p>That's
right. Use T-Jax. Tarvaris will be the man for Minnesota, he will.
Well, that's what I think. Sure, he wasn't successful in his first two
years, having a total of eleven touchdowns and 16 touchdowns.</p> <p>But
in his third year, after being on the bench, learning from a veteran in
Gus Frerotte who became the starter. But then, Frerotte got injured and
then here came Jackson who everyone doubted.</p> <p>In one game in
which I believe was against the Arizona Cardinals, Jackson had a
spectacular game by throwing for four touchdowns while having 163 yards
and an amazing 135.5 quarterback rating.</p> <p>He also had a great game before that, throwing for 105 yards with one touchdown for a 143.8 quarterback rating.</p> <p>Solid, huh?</p> <p>In
his last four games of the 2008 season, Jackson's lowest quarterback
rating was 88.5 in that four-game span. Here's what his total was
during those four games:</p> <p><strong>740 passing yards, eight touchdowns and one interception for a 116.5 quarterback rating.<br /></strong></p> <p>Now those are very good stats. You can't disagree there. And all of that happen after being benched from learning from Frerotte.</p> <p>Jackson had 1,056 passing yards, nine touchdowns and two interceptions for a 95.4 quarterback rating.</p> <p>Jackson is a solid quarterback.</p> <p>But
he needed to be benched so he could learn better and not take so much
criticism. With the 2008 season closing, the Vikes looked like they
couldn't make the playoffs with Frerotte out and T-Jax in.</p> <p>They did, though.</p> <p>Sure,
Jackson didn't win his first playoff game but not everyone does when
they go for the first time. The only person I know has done that is
probably Tom Brady, no one else. Peyton Manning didn't get it.</p> <p>Not
everyone gets their first playoff win. People expect too much out of
Tarvaris Jackson. You have to give him time, this kid has a future. And
with the pick of Percy Harvin, the Jackson can have more <em>helpful </em>guys to throw to.</p> <p>And
Jackson is ready now. I observed something. Here's what happened in the
first three games Jackson played in, before being benched from the
veteran of Gus Frerotte:</p> <p><strong>316 passing yards, one touchdown and one interception for a 77.4 quarterback rating. </strong></p> <p>Now
if you scroll up, you'll see a major difference between when he started
his first three games without learning from a veteran quarterback and
the stats after he was benched by a veteran quarterback.</p> <p>Big ass difference.</p> <p>Jackson is ready and could be a star from years to come. No <a href="http://www.benkepple.com/Images/sage.jpg">Rosenfels</a> or <a href="http://jasonjeffrey.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/favre-douche.jpg">Favre</a>.</p> <p>Tarvaris Jackson is here to stay.</p> <p>So
Vikings fans, what would you have: An old quarterback who will only
stay with the team for one year and will only come to the Vikings to
bring revenge on his old team or bring in a quarterback who is
detirmened and will be a great quarterback for years to come?</p> <p>You decide, and the time is...now!</p></div> ]]></description>
            <link>http://mvn.com/coltscouchcrew/2009/06/minnesota-vikings-dont-get-brett-favre-tarvaris-jackson-is-the-answer.html</link>
            <guid>http://mvn.com/coltscouchcrew/2009/06/minnesota-vikings-dont-get-brett-favre-tarvaris-jackson-is-the-answer.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Brad Childress</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Brett Favre</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Green Bay Packers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Houston Texans</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Indianapolis Colts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Minnesota Vikings</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">New York Jets</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL Playoffs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Percy Harvin</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Sage Rosenfels</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Tarvaris Jackson</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>2009 USC Preview: Linebackers - Replacing Legends</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Football is almost here! Now we are less than two months removed from the beginning of Fall Camp for college football.</p>

<p>In the mean time, I am missing USC Football.</p>

<p>So, for the next few weeks, I am going to begin my USC Football preview for 2009. Position by position.</p>

<p>Check back daily to see updates for previews of the other positions.</p><p>------------</p><p>In 2008, the USC Football team was loaded at the linebacker position. Brian Cushing, Rey Maualuga, Clay Matthews, Jr., and Kaluka Maiava were all drafted in the first four rounds of this year's NFL Draft.</p>

<p>Two were drafted in the first round.</p>

<p>Another was the 2008 college football defensive player of the year.</p>

<p>The three linebackers that will replace these guys have a whopping total of zero starts in collegiate football.</p>

<p>I think it's safe to say it may be a challenge for the linebacker corps to follow up with what has been such a deep position for the past six years or so.</p>

<p>But wait until you see the guys who are projected to step in and replace them.</p>

<p>The first is outside linebacker, <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Michael Morgan</span>. Morgan is the backbone of what has been called one of the fastest groups of linebackers in USC's prestigious history. Running a 4.3 40-yard dash in the spring's workouts show that speed at its finest. He has the speed to combat a Javhid Best sprinting down the sideline.</p>

<p>Another linebacker, who is replacing Maualuga, <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Chris Galippo</span> is quickly evolving into the leader of this year's crew. Playing the Mike backer position, Galippo has a lot of size and speed to play the position very well. He considers himself a good "sideline-to-sideline player" who always continues the play until the whistle.</p><p></p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="chris galippo.png" src="http://mvn.com/thepurpletrojan/chris%20galippo.png" width="500" height="375" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></span><p></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Chris Galippo and Former LB Clay Matthews, Jr. <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">(Flickr.com)</span></p>

<p>The third, <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; ">Malcolm Smith</span> is becoming the scariest and most feared of the linebackers. And someone who has the goods to succeed. When looking at it, Smith seems to bring a little from both Morgan and Galippo into himself. He has the strength and power to make devastating tackles, but also brings a ton of speed to the table, contributing to the aforementioned speed of the Trojan linebackers.</p>

<p>While the new crew may not be as explosive as last year's, these USC linebackers will remain one of the top classes in college football for another year.</p>

<p>Although a young class, with no collegiate starts, each of these three have had substantial playing time, coming in on back-up and mop-up duty situations all last season, as well as being major contributors on special teams.</p>

<p>They are ready to embrace the new challenge</p>

<p>I think it's safe to say it may be a challenge for the linebacker corps to replace legends.</p>

<p>But I also think it's safe to say the projected starting linebackers have what it takes to become one of the best corps in the nations.</p>

<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Reserve Linebackers:</span> Luther Brown, Jordan Campbell, Ross Cumming, Dan Deckas, Nick Garratt, Uona, Kaveinga,</p>

<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Recruits</span>: Marquis Simmons, Frankie Telfort</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://mvn.com/thepurpletrojan/2009/06/usc-linebackers-replacing-legends.html</link>
            <guid>http://mvn.com/thepurpletrojan/2009/06/usc-linebackers-replacing-legends.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Bengals</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blog</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cleveland Browns</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Green Bay Packers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Houston Texans</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">USC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">USC Football</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:25:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>BREAKING NEWS: Brett Favre Will Not Be a Viking in 2009</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the Minnesota Vikings have <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4246757">suspended their pursuit of Brett Favre</a>. According to ESPN, Brad Childress and the Vikings were looking for Favre to participate in some of the team's OTAs this week. But he been a no-show. From ESPN's Ed Werder,&nbsp;</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The Minnesota Vikings have at least temporarily suspended their pursuit of Brett Favre after the retired quarterback failed to report to organized team activities that began Tuesday as head coach Brad Childress had mandated, according to team and league sources.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This decision actually makes me very happy. After all the commotion, I started to get excited for the possibility of Favre starting with the Vikings. </p>

<p>But, with all the drama unfolding the past month, I began to have second thoughts myself. He is a basket case, full of media attention. And I'm not sure the Vikings needed that. </p>

<p>But most of all, I'm happy to know the decision is over. </p>

<p>Now, the Vikings can move on with their roster. And start preparing for a Super Bowl trip coming this February. </p>

<p>Whether it be Tarvaris Jackson or Sage Rosenfels to start at QB, the Vikings can finally embark on their 2009 season! </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://mvn.com/thepurpletrojan/2009/06/breaking-news-brett-favre-will-not-be-a-viking-in-2009.html</link>
            <guid>http://mvn.com/thepurpletrojan/2009/06/breaking-news-brett-favre-will-not-be-a-viking-in-2009.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">AFC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Brett Favre</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Green Bay Packers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Minnesota Vikings</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFC North</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NFL</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:35:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
