The State of Hockey News

Miserly moves by the Wild causes fans to question the direction of the team

This July 1st, Wild fans expected to experience some rather profound changes with its roster.  For a few Wild players from last season, playing in Europe appeared to be a more desireable option, included in this was some of the Wild’s more physical players who decided to take their hits and fists to other teams; while for others a hefty payday was enough for them to seek ‘greener’ (both literally and figuratively) pastures.  Yet, I wonder how many of these Wild fans expected to see its team change from one that had a balance of younger and older players that won its first division title to one that is considerably younger and likely going to have far more struggle ahead. 

Enter Wild General Manager and President Doug Risebrough in the role of Ebeneezer Scrooge and as free agency period opened up Tuesday the team felt it made its “most important” moves by bringing back Andrew Brunette and trading for Marek Zidlicky.  While the team’s expansion sister has made a rennaissance of moves one has to wonder if Risebrough in the role of Scrooge told his assistant Chris Snow (in the role of the ever humble Bob Cratchit) ‘Bah humbug’ to making any significant moves after the team failed to land Marian Hossa with a $8 million / year multi-year contract.  After the Wild came up short in their bid to land the versatile Slovak he apparently decided that spending significant money to bring in a quality player to offset the loss of over a 100 points in the departures of Pavol Demitra and Brian Rolston was not necessary and instead opted for 2nd / 3rd liner Antti Miettinen.  While Miettinen is a responsible two-way player; his 34 points he accumulated while playing on Dallas Stars’ line that featured their leading scorer Mike Ribeiro and its most complete player Brendan Morrow appears rather disturbing to say the least.  By osmosis alone, Miettinen should have easily been able to manage more than 15 goals and 34 points on that line; so is it realistic for the Wild to expect that sort of production if he is to play on a line that is less well rounded? 

In Charles Dickens’ classic, A Christmas Carol, Ebeneezer Scrooge would bicker and harumph almost any decision to spend money.  Is Risebrough being a bit too Scrooge-like?  Some of his comments to the Minneapolis Star Tribune and St. Paul Pioneer Press make it appear that way.  Risebrough told the Pioneer Press’ John Shipley, “If that’s what we’re selling and people don’t buy it, I’m not worried about losing that type of player. I know I’ll find someone who’s a good fit, and I know the difference between teams is so small.”   In other words I’ll find someone cheaper even if those players are asking for their ‘market value’ price.  It is also rather obvious that like Scrooge (at least in the beginning of A Christmas Carol) that he has little to no regrets about his approach when he added, “I’m comfortable with our identity. If a guy says, ‘It’s not a fit for me,’ I’m glad I know that now versus finding out later on. If a guy says he wants to go somewhere else, that’s OK with me; we’ll find somebody else.”  In other words, if a guy doesn’t want to play for the price we’re willing to play let him go because we’ll find someone (not necessarily equal ability) who will.  That’s hardly comforting to the fans to know this organization believes it will pay only what its willing to as opposed to finding a happy medium between the player and the organization.  Here is the team’s current roster and the salaries that are committed for the 2008-09 season. 

Forwards:

Marian Gaborik ~ $6.33 Million

Mikko Koivu ~ $3.25 Million

Mark Parrish ~ $2.650 Million

Andrew Brunette ~ $2.333 Million

Antti Miettinen ~ $2.333 Million

Eric Belanger ~ $1.75 Million

Benoit Pouliot ~ $1.7 Million

James Sheppard ~ $1.4 Million

Derek Boogaard ~ $950,000

Craig Weller ~ $600,000

Cal Clutterbuck ~ $623,000

Total: 11 forwards for $24.022 Million

Defensemen:

Kim Johnsson ~ $4.85 Million

Brent Burns ~ $3.55 Million

Nick Schultz ~ $3.5 Million

Marek Zidlicky ~ $3.35 Million

Martin Skoula ~ $1.8 Million

*Kurtis Foster ~ $1.0025 Million

Marc-Andre Bergeron ~ $1.107 Million

Erik Reitz ~ $500,000

Total:  8 defensemen for $19.8 Million

Goaltenders: 
Niklas Backstrom ~ $3.1 Million

Josh Harding ~ $725,000

Total:  2 goaltenders for $3.825 Million

Grand Total Committed for 2008/09 thus far: $47.7 Million

Restricted Free Agents still out: Stephane Veilleux, Pierre-Marc Bouchard

It should be noted that with defenseman Kurtis Foster likely to be rehabbing his broken femur beyond the start of the 2008/09 season that only a portion of his just over $1 million dollar contract will count against the cap.  If Foster arrives in December or January he could almost count as half of that $1 million figure according to the Long Term Injury rules of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.  Either way the team projects to be carrying 8 defenseman next season once Foster returns and 5 out of the 8 are somewhat noted for the offensive ability.   

Stephane Veilleux projects to have a modest raise to around $2 million per season and the team has been pleased with his progress into an effective checking winger and penalty killer.  A far more intriguing situation revolves around the possible re-signing of Pierre-Marc Bouchard.  The team does not want to sign him to a one-year deal; but would rather get him signed long-term.  If a long-term deal is out of the question, which is implied by the comments of Bouchard’s agent Allan Walsh then the team will likely seek to trade.  Yet with the milquetoast offensive signings can the team afford to pass up on Bouchard?  With the exception of Marian Gaborik the team is not returning any player who scored over 20 goals last season.  Here is a list of the goals leaving the Wild versus what the team has acquired this summer. 

Departures: 

Brian Rolston - 31 goals

Pavol Demitra - 15 goals

Branko Radivojevic - 7 goals

Aaron Voros - 7 goals

Todd Fedoruk - 6 goals

Keith Carney - 1 goal

Petteri Nummelin - 2 goals

Sean Hill - 2 goals

Total Goals Lost:  71 goals

New Arrivals:

Andrew Brunnette - 19 goals

Antti Miettinen - 15 goals

Marek Zidlicky - 5 goals

Marc-Andre Bergeron - 9 goals

Craig Weller - 3 goals

Total Goals Acquired: 51 goals

This means it is a net loss of 20 goals to the Wild’s lineup which begs the immeidate question, where is the offense going to come from?  In the playoffs against the Avalanche it was a lack of scoring that doomed the Wild to a 1st round exit and now it appears the team’s biggest hurdle is finding ways to bury the biscuit.  There is hope that youngsters James Sheppard and Benoit Pouliot will find the net more than they did last season but neither appears on the cusp of having a breakout year.  Mikko Koivu, who was forced to miss a fair portion of the season due to a lumberjack whack by Vancouver’s Mattias Ohlund will likely improve upon last year’s modest 11 goals during the regular season. 

Without more consistent scorers Rolston to carry the load that will also mean a greater emphasis on Bouchard (if he is still here when the season starts) to score goals as opposed to simply being a playmaker.  The same sort of raised expectations will also be in place for Bloomington, Minnesota-native Mark Parrish to find away to carve out his offensive niche with the team albeit at the start of his 3rd season wth the team.  Parrish is the Wild’s second highest returning scorer from last season with 16 goals but was far more notable for being in Wild Head Coach Jacques Lemaire’s doghouse towards the latter half of the season.  If the team cannot find a way to place Parrish on the 1st or 2nd lines where he could be effective as a goal-mouth sniper the team should seek to trade him even if it means maybe taking mid-level draft picks in return.  To place him on the checking line and in a defensive role is just a waste of his abilities and does nothing to bring about the offense in his game. 

Newcomers Andrew Brunette put up solid seasons with the Avalanche but he was playing on a line that featured Joe Sakic and occasionally the talented sophomore Paul Stastny both of whom will be superior in quality to who ‘Bruno’ will be paired with next year.  Antti Miettinen has some ability to create scoring chances on his own but is hardly as dynamic offensively as Demitra was. 

Other possible contributors are rookies Colton Gillies and Cal Clutterbuck who will have a chance to show what they can do with the big club next season but neither are your classic scorers and far more noted for the energy and physical style so it is unlikely they would be able to give the team a significant boost in goal production.  Yet overall its impossible not to notice how the team appears to have significantly less firepower than it did a season ago.  Considering this was the problem that doomed the team to a 1st round exit despite winning its 1st division title in franchise history it is hardly a shock that many fans believe the team will be worse next season.  Some fans are even wondering if the team will fail in its bid to make the post-season a 4th time in its young history. 

While that may make Wild fans sound greedy; the expectations for the organization have steadily increased the last few years.  The departures of both scorers and fan favorites have annoyed a fanbase that has been among the most loyal and dedicated in the league providing the organization with over 230+ consecutive sellouts.  The Wild’s approach to allowing some of its better talent leave for little or nothing in return has brought up comparison’s to other Minnesota-based sports teams who have in the past been forced to part with stars because they decided they did not wish to pay them what they wanted.  Fans had hoped this organization would be above that because as fans they’ve provided the team with ample revenues and there has not been a season where hockey was played where this team did not end up in the black at season’s end. 

So the big question then becomes is this team going in the right direction?  It will not just be a question Wild fans are asking but also its star player, Marian Gaborik.  Gaborik, who is still under contract for next season might as well be a Restricted Free Agent at this point as the team must consider a way of making a long-term contract extension to its Slovak sniper otherwise it could be forced to trade its prized franchise player for fear of losing him to unrestricted free agency next summer.  The Trencin, Slovakia-native tried to help out by luring his friend Marian Hossa to the team but to no avail.  It was Gaborik’s friendship with Pavol Demitra that prompted Minnesota to trade for him two years ago; so keeping their franchise player happy will likely be difficult when you consider he is now the only Slovak on the team.  With all this being said, Gaborik’s perceptions as to where this team is headed will play a significant role whether he choose to re-sign or rather test free agency.  Wild fans are hoping the team will be able to sign Gaborik to some sort of contract extension this summer before training camp opens in September. 

While the State of Hockey is proud of their NHL team they certainly do not like the thought of taking a step backwards which is what likely to occur this upcoming season.  The honeymoon of expansion is behind this team whether it chooses to acknowledge it or not.  The fans want to see tangible results; and to a degree they got that last season.  Yet now the expectation is not simply making the playoffs but advancing beyond the 1st round.  This summer’s free agency activity appears to even make the prospect of qualifying for the post-season a bit of a long-shot.  The team still has some talented players and in some respects may have improved itself from a season ago.  Yet just because there are some ‘ifs’ and ‘maybe’s’ that could work in the Wild’s favor it does not mean the fans will continue to accept increases in ticket prices if that is not reflected in an improved product on the ice.  New Wild owner Craig Leipold may wish to be a bit more sensitive to that, and as a person who demonstrated a fan-like attitude when he owned the Predators he should have no doubts fans will approach him and ask him tough questions.  Especially so if team struggles due to a lack of scoring.  This will also likely result in more pressure on Doug Risebrough to deliver at a rate he may not have had to when Bob Naegele Jr. owned the team.  It is far from doom and gloom for the Wild at this point; but the fans feel the team’s direction is a bit more ‘cloudy’ than they wish.  Hopefully by the start of the season that direction will be more clear to the team and fans as well.  As for Doug Risebrough; just wish you don’t get a visit from Jacob Marley as the Ghost of Season’s past. 

9 Responses to “Miserly moves by the Wild causes fans to question the direction of the team”

  1. MNslappy says:

    July 5th, 2008 at 1:23 am

    I share most of your same sentiments guy. I hope our pessimism is proven wrong.

    As I stew about the last couple of weeks, there is at least one thing that keeps popping up in my mind that gives me at least a little hope for the upcoming season: the number of division games and the way Colorado and Vancouver both seem to have taken a step back IMO, at least on paper anyway. I know it’s way too early for this, but just looking up and down the rosters, this might very well turn out to be the weakest the NW has been since the Wild joined the league.

  2. Derek Felska says:

    July 7th, 2008 at 7:41 am

    Excellent point. Vancouver has slipped considerably and are by far the weakest team in the Northwest at least by how it looks so far. Even if they land Sundin I do not see this team being any better and likely worse than it was last season. Colorado also has fallen back as well; with Sakic weighing his options and Forsberg’s health about as ’solid’ as Lutefisk. I think that bodes well for the Wild; yet there are other teams in the Western Conference that have improved themselves considerably even though they were non-playoff teams.

    Columbus made a rash of upgrades (Umberger, Huselius, Commodore plus Brassard) and to a lesser extent Chicago (Campbell, Huet) did as well. Phoenix boosted their offense by adding Jokinen and we’ll see if that will offset the loss of Boynton and Ballard. That will in some way offset the weakness of the division, but it certainly will increase our chances of perhaps finishing 2nd or 1st. Thanks for the comment.

  3. Wildfan JC says:

    July 7th, 2008 at 3:34 pm

    I am mourning the loss of Rolston and Fedoruk the most this off-season. I am also very sad that the Wild were not able to sign Hossa. Demitra leaving didn’t really affect me though; he was not as passionate as he normally is this past season.

    But I am not really dissapointed with the off-season moves of the Wild. Point comparision (between how many points/goals are leaving and coming) only goes so far to map out the next season for a team. Points fluxuate from season to season for every player.

    I feel that Miettinen is a formidable player. The fact that he scored 34 points on the Ribero/Morrow line says more positive than negative; Ribero/Morrow were highlighted and Miettinen was the minified third man on that line. The fact he was able to get that many points on that line is actually a positive.

    Adding Nolan and Brunette will add (in my opinion) a stronger veteran presence than we had in Demitra and Rolston. Rolston was a very strong veteran presence, but Demitra was not. So adding Both Nolan and Bruno will give us more than we had previously. And lastly Zidlicky will step in the massive holes that plagued our blue-line last year. Hill/Carney/Nummelin did not cut it (though I really like Carney he had a bad year).

  4. Derek Felska says:

    July 7th, 2008 at 4:55 pm

    Thanks for the comment; yet if having a team with a horde of 15-goal scorers (which is what we project to have) was the way to go far in the post-season then why don’t we see more teams try it?

    The Wild were carried at many different portions of their seasons the last 3 years by points from Gaborik or Rolston. Now half of that offense is gone and team has just one real threatening line allowing teams to focus virtually all of their attention on stopping Marian Gaborik. We saw in the playoffs how this team could be shut down if Gaborik was eliminated as an offensive threat.

    Brunnette is a good guy and I sincerely believe that he’s elated to be back; but do I expect him to replicate the numbers he had in Colorado? No. Who’s going to be the finisher for him if he ends up on the 2nd line? Or do you want to slow Gaborik down by putting Brunette on the 1st line? A huge part of our problem is we have a lot of guys that are at the 2nd / 3rd line level. I think we could spend over half the year really hammering out any solid pairings.

    Zidlicky to me was the best acquisition of all; although I wish it didn’t cost us Ryan Jones who I think will be a solid NHL’er someday. Thanks again for the comment!

  5. Derek Larson says:

    July 8th, 2008 at 1:16 pm

    You know, as the signings by the wild were made this off-season I was immediately excited they are bringing Brunette back. Then, Zidlicky, etc.. Then on the ESPN ticker one day I see that the Devils sign Rolston and then realized all those other Wild players were gone. I went from excitement to dissapointment now. I agree with the poster of this blog in that it seems like we are taking a step back or at least risking it. Now you have a bunch of guys who haven’t played together that now have to “gel” as they say. If we can’t get PMB inked to a long term deal then I think Doug R needs to go. This is starting to remind me of the Twins and Vikings for sure where we for some reason can’t hang onto our top players. The Twins are an the exception where they just compete no matter who they throw out there but the NHL is different. I am concerned about this up coming season but I do think we will compete, just expect another nail biting finish in the division race and if we do find the post-season I think it will be another early exit. Doesn’t really matter anyway since Detroit is going to repeat.

  6. MJ Kasprzak says:

    July 9th, 2008 at 1:19 am

    WOW, that is a long and detailed column. I might suggest breaking it up into two to spread things out, but you rock in terms of educational information. I think I will be visiting your site more often even though you write for a team that is not mine.
    And I have always wondered why the Wild don’t spend a little more, and really saw this year that failure to move forward. It was like, “we acheived our goal by winning the division, now let’s let people go–just enough to make some money on our success but still make the playoffs.”

  7. Derek Felska says:

    July 9th, 2008 at 1:08 pm

    Thanks for the comments.

    To Mr Larson. Personally I’d rather have the team trade Bouchard if they do not believe he’ll sign a long-term deal. Part of that is Doug Risebrough’s fault for not locking him down to a long-term deal earlier and instead always opting for 1-year deals. While Bouchard has developed into a good playmaking forward I do not think his production will be as high next year thus diluting his trade value which is at its peak right now. While it might hurt in the short term it will be good for the organization in the long-run especially if they can get a quality centre in exchange.

    To Mr. Kasprzak, thanks for your comments. I did not intend on the article being that long; but it does appear artificially longer because of the two lists. I guess I felt the topic deserved to examine both angles. Yet I appreciate what you have to say. As far as the props about the information, thank you. I’m glad you appreciated it.

  8. MJ Kasprzak says:

    July 10th, 2008 at 11:20 am

    No problem. What I have done in the past is to break the long ones up–like in my player grades, I focused on forwards and defense seperately. That allowed me to have two posts ready in back-to-back days, giving more new stuff for readers and making each easier on their time constraints.

    I look forward to reading more of your stuff in the future, since the Wild are still probably my second favourite team.

  9. Derek Felska says:

    July 11th, 2008 at 5:33 pm

    I have done that from time to time; but this article was unusually long. Thanks again!

Leave a comment

THE AUTHOR

Derek Felska

Info | Friends

ARCHIVE

July 2008
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

SPONSORS