November 16, 2008
Do the Lightning Have a Clue?
The Tampa Bay Lightning fired head coach Barry Melrose over the weekend after the team got off to a 5-7-4 start. Ideally, the gist of the move is to stop the bleeding before the season gets too far along and there's no time to turn it around, but I'm here to tell you that it was a meaningless move. THis team is dead in the water less than a quarter of the way into the season.
This was a very strange offseason for Tampa Bay. For a long time, their team was Vinny Lecavalier, Martin St. Louis, Brad Richards, and 18-20 completely expendable and replaceable scrubs. Add in a complete lack of a dependable goaltender, and you have a team that struggled out of the gate last season as well, going 5-8-1 through their first 14 games. They went on to not see .500 after December 11th in a mess of a season.
The team dealt away Brad Richards and got themselves a dependable goalie in Mike Smith, a good young winger in Jussi Jokinen, and a solid veteran center in Jeff Halpern, but they still struggled to win consistently because nobody outside of St. Louis and Lecavalier was producing on offense. Come the end of the season, those two accounted for almost 40% of their team's offensive production.
So, how did the front office fix this problem? They fired head coach John Tortorella and replaced him with Barry Melrose, a guy who hadn't coached in any capacity at any level since 1995. Then, they went free agent shopping. Who did they bring in? March Recchi, Gary Roberts, Ryan Malone, Adam Hall, Matt Pettinger, Marek Malik, Olaf Kolzig and #1 draft pick Steve Stamkos.
Let's look at those players: Recchi, Roberts, Malone and Hall all played with Pittsburgh last season and were all not retained because they were (accurately) deemed unspectacular and replaceable. Also, Recchi is 40 and Roberts is 42.
The rest are all the same. Malik is 33, Kolzig is 38, both free agents because their previous teams considered them not young or talented enough to be worth replacing.
The question then becomes, if they weren't worth keeping for their previous teams, why would they be worth signing to your team?
Granted, the team possesses more offensive talent now, between Lecavalier, St. Louis, Jokinen, and Stamkos. However, Stamkos is as far in over his head as he looks, because as talented as he is, he is far too green to the NHL game to have so little talent around him.
This reminds me of being a Pittsburgh Pirates fan over the years of the now-dead Dave Littlefield Era. The Lightning management brought in a lot of recognizable names who played for good teams, who who themselves are not good players.
I appreciate that because bringing in Melrose as coach wasn't really a solution to anything, firing him doesn't really solve anything. He had a team that didn't respect him and wasn't responding, and there's no point retaining a lame duck coach. We'll see if they play for the new guy.
Between the random muckpile of free agents the team brought in to surround their two stars, two supporting players and star-to-be, and the strange choice of Barry Melrose as coach, it's hard to believe that the new ownership in Tampa really has the slightest clue what they are doing.
Now things get even stranger for the team, since the firing of Melrose means the promotion of Rick Tocchet to interim head coach. That's right, the same Rick Tocchet who had spent the last two seasons completely out of hockey because he got caught gambling. A fine, upstanding choice as a fill-in coach, for sure.
I can only think that the question Tampa fans have left is whether the new ownership is still figuring out what it takes and things will get better, or whether the fans are doomed because those guys haven't got the foggiest clue.
Without some serious changes in tactics, I'll have to lean towards the latter.

-
Best of MVN
The Queensberry Rules
Year-End Pound-For-Pound Top 20 List
Whereas before you could make an argument for Juan Manuel Marquez or Joe Calzaghe to deserve the top pound-for-pound spot, Manny Pacquiao's destruction of Oscar De La Hoya in a weight class well above where he started the year should end that debate. He's the best. Case closed.More of the "Best of MVN"
Discussion
1 Comment on "Do the Lightning Have a Clue?"
#1
Posted by Derek Felska, November 21, 2008 3:41 PM
When the Minnesota Wild played Tampa Bay earlier this season and as I watched the game with a group of Wild fans at a local establishment right across the street from the Xcel Energy Center I got more than a few confused looks when I said that Barry Melrose could be fired within a month. People looked at me if I was from outer space, as if to say, "whatever, who would fire their coach after about a month behind the bench" but after seeing the hair trigger moves to trade for Matt Carle and then grow impatient and deal him to Philadelphia told me all I needed to know. This team is not run by "General Manager" Brian Lawton, its run by Len Barrie and Oren Koules.
Lawton merely a figurehead of a powerless spot as the two owners show all the patience of your typical first-year fantasy hockey team manager; dumping and trading players with tremendous frequency with no regard to synergy or possible development. While fantasy teams are all about getting the maximum points now a hair trigger like attitude is somewhat expected. Yet in the NHL with the salary cap teams must be far more deliberate with their decision-making because knee-jerk reactions could hurt the team for years. Yet the Lightning who more or less overhauled the majority of its roster canned its new-old coach just 16 games into the season as the GM...cough...owners were looking over the shoulder like the impatient IT guys at work who would rather fix it themselves then tell you how to do the same.
In this situation, Barry Melrose or ANY coach had no chance unless they managed to win right away. The Lightning have little to no cohesion and the key veterans are not performing well at all; Vrbata crawled out of the gate and St. Louis and Lecavalier started the season in a drought. The supposedly high flying, high scoring Lightning was little more than a static spark out there and the owners were not going to wait until mid-season to make a move. A few players whined; and the owners didn't like seeing their heavily marketed player having just 14 minutes per night (which is fairly considerable ice time for ANY rookie) so they canned him.
Last Saturday on Hockey Night in Canada, Barry Melrose talked with CBC's Ron McLean about his firing and it was impossible not to agree with the points Melrose made. He felt outed by the players and management and he couldn't be more right. I do not think any coach wants to feel they're sitting on a powder keg ready to explode in their termination but Oren Koules and Len Barrie have showed they will not tolerate any kind of failure or slow development. They might think they're holding the team and its players accountable but instead of really shaking up the room by trading a key player they traded a guy no one got to know that well in the first place minimizing its effect. If you want to be about player accountability; which is what you are to believe if you bought what Brian Lawton said on NHL Radio, then trading a player like St. Louis likely would've shaken things up a lot more effectively. Melrose was clearly the scapegoat and it is unfortunate he never at least got a full season to see if his style could do well in the 'new' NHL.












Leave a comment