November 26, 2008
On Bedard: 'There's no saving that move'
Can Bedard turn it around? -- wcamnlin/Flickr.com
In an ongoing discussion with bloggers outside of the MVN network about their respective MLB teams, I'd like to welcome Jeff Sullivan. Sullivan is the author of the Seattle Mariners blog, Lookout Landing.
Alan: What were your reasonable expectations for the Mariners this season? And at what point did things start to go wrong -- is there a moment you can pinpoint to?
Alan: What were your reasonable expectations for the Mariners this season? And at what point did things start to go wrong -- is there a moment you can pinpoint to?
Jeff: Given the active offseason they had, I went into the year with the M's pegged as a true talent -- 84-88 win team, good enough to stay interesting but not good enough to beat out the Angels in a fair fight. Lackey and Escobar getting injured certainly lifted my spirits, and while I remained forever cautious, I was guardedly optimistic. Then the baseball happened.
As tempting as it is to point to the second day of the season as the turning point - the bulletproof JJ Putz got injured and blew a save - I don't believe in that sort of thing, and it was really just the course of the first couple months that made it abundantly clear that this team was headed in the wrong direction. A thrilling win over the Angels got them to 10-10, and they surpassed .500 the next game, but after that they lost 16 of their next 20 contests and dropped irreversibly out of contention. The offense couldn't hit, the pitchers couldn't pitch, and the defenders couldn't defend. A team that was more hyped than perhaps any in franchise history stood 11.5 games back of first place at the end of May.
So, no, there was no singular defining moment. There was a never-ending sequence of moments. All of them bad.
Alan: Were you a fan of the Erik Bedard trade at the time? And what are your thoughts on how to handle him now?
Jeff: I hated the Bedard trade at the time. So did the guys over at USS Mariner. It probably sounds like I'm covering my ass, but I'm telling the truth - I thought it was an unthinkably high price to pay for only a modest improvement.
While I was all about Erik Bedard and considered him to be one of the best pitchers in baseball, losing Jones gave us a hole in RF and losing Sherrill gave us a hole in the bullpen -- big holes that were going to cost us runs. And that doesn't even factor in the three prospects.
But things went as they did and now we're stuck with a broken pitcher who delivered all of 81 league-average innings. I still like Erik Bedard. I think a healthy Erik Bedard is a phenomenal asset. The problem is that Erik Bedard is only healthy Erik Bedard like 30% of the time that he's pitching. If I'm in charge, I let Bedard work his way back into playing shape and see how he performs. Then I cross my fingers that he pitches well leading up to the deadline so I can try to move him for prospects to make up some of the massive ground the organization already lost when it got him in the first place.
There's no saving that move. There's only salvaging it.
Alan: In keeping with the rotation, how have they handled Brandon Morrow in your opinion? Would you make a him a starter, reliever?
Jeff: I haven't been a fan of the way they've handled Morrow, but at least they finally got him starting baseball games late last summer. It took them long enough.
I thought it was silly to push him almost immediately into the Major League bullpen after being drafted, because being a reliever isn't at all like being a starter. He seems to be on the right track now, though, so that's something, provided you think the ends justify the means. Unfortunately being a reliever set back his starting development a little ways, so it'll be a bit before we see him get more polished, but there's still a lot of potential in there.
Witness his first start against New York. Morrow has dynamite stuff; he just needs to work on commanding his pitches better and keeping a consistent grip on his curveball. There's no touching that pitch when he has it working right. A good Morrow curve is one of the best curves on the planet.
Morrow has too much ability not to start. He deserves an extended trial. If it doesn't work out, then whatever, at least they tried, but they need to keep him on the starting path for the next few years to see if they can in part assuage the misery from having passed on Tim Lincecum. The reward is greater than the risk.
Jeff: Hmm. Clement showed some ability, but he swung through too many pitches and struck out looking a good bit. The strikeouts killed him. His power showed itself on a few occasions, but, okay, take that two-homer game he had in July that beat the Tigers. Those two homers were his only two hits over a 28-AB span.Visit MVN's Mariners community page for ongoing coverage of the Seattle Mariners with 'Mariners Minors' and 'Caffeinated Confines'.
Over the same span he struck out nine times. That's kind of his 2008 in a nutshell. He also continued to raise questions about how long he'll be able to stick behind the plate, and there are real concerns that the team will have to move him to another position sooner, rather than later. So it was a struggle for Clement. But it wasn't as much of a struggle for him as it was for Wlad, who was a disaster.
He couldn't make any sort of consistent contact with the ball, and while he flashed a little range every now and again, overall his defense was poor. I guess the polite way of putting things is that, for both of the players, 2008 was a learning experience. Clement's a part of the team's future, be it behind the plate or somewhere around it. And Wlad could be a part of it, too. But I think he's expendable, as - if he's ever able to put things together - he's got the kind of skillset that 1) doesn't play well in Safeco, and 2) tends to get overrated by other GMs. I'm just not sold on him yet. Yeah, he's young. Yeah, he's talented. But he's not complete, and I'm not sure he ever will be. If someone comes calling with a decent offer, he is not a player I'd be sad to see dealt.

-
Best of MVN
The Queensberry Rules
Year-End Pound-For-Pound Top 20 List
Whereas before you could make an argument for Juan Manuel Marquez or Joe Calzaghe to deserve the top pound-for-pound spot, Manny Pacquiao's destruction of Oscar De La Hoya in a weight class well above where he started the year should end that debate. He's the best. Case closed.More of the "Best of MVN"
Discussion
Start the discussion on "On Bedard: 'There's no saving that move'"




















Leave a comment