November 17, 2008
Packers Feast on Bears
Matt Forte was supposed to be the back that flourished in the renewal of the oldest rivalry in professional football. Aaron Rodgers was supposed to be the guy that carried the Green Bay Packers to victory.
With the Packers injuries piling up and the wind blowing at Lambeau Field, the conditions were ripe for the Chicago Bears to all but knock the Packers out of the playoffs. Both teams would have to rely more on their running game, and the Bears defense had just held the Tennessee Titans to 20 yards on 29 carries; the Packers had just yielded over 200 yards for the second time this season and have given up an average of over 150 yards per game.
Ryan Grant and the much-maligned Packers offensive line had other ideas. Grant ran the ball for 145 yards on 25 carries (5.8 average) and a touchdown, including 105 yards in the first half when the Packers took control of the game with a 17-3 lead. It was only Grant's second 100-yard game this season, and the other required over 30 carries to reach.
In addition, the Packers defense held the Bears to 84 yards on 20 carries (4.2 average), only the second game in which their opponents didn't run for 100 yards; the other two were against the two worst rushing attacks in the league, the Lions and Colts. Matt Forte finished with 16 carries for 64 yards (4.0 average), and no Bear had a run of over 10 yards.
Kyle Orton was mediocre, going 13-26 (.500) for 133 yards before being pulled in favour of Rex Grossman after a very Grossman-like fumble. He simply dropped a shotgun snap that Jason Hunter recovered and returned for a touchdown, setting a franchise record ninth defensive touchdown and sealing the victory. Grossman was 4-7 (.571) for 26 yards in relief of Orton.
Green Bay rarely blitzed, but they got the only sack (Charles Woodson) when they did. There was constant pressure on Orton, however, a difficult thing for him to handle with his bad ankle.
Aaron Rodgers did play well, going 23-30 (.767) for 227 yards and two touchdowns against only one interception and no sacks. He also completed passes to nine different receivers, but he was little-used at times, passing just once on seven plays in a Packer drive that culminated in Grant's touchdown.
Even when Grant went to the bench shaken up, Brandon Jackson picked up right where his teammate left off; he finished the game with 10 rushes and 50 yards. Overall, the Packers had 38 rushes and 200 yards (5.2 average).
Mason Crosby had a 53-yard field goal among his three for the day. One was also an ill-advised 45-yarder with under two minutes to go and a 34-3 lead; who are we, the Patriots? We have to play these guys again...but that is the only complaint I have in this contest.
(I originally wrote this article for Bleacher Report.)
Discussion
6 Comments on "Packers Feast on Bears"
#1
Posted by MichaelM, November 17, 2008 5:15 AM
Many cellphones in our store, Motorola etc., many news - Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, best price
#2
Posted by Mark, November 18, 2008 3:44 AM
Maybe McCarthy wants to be known as the Belicek of the North.
#3
Posted by Mark, November 18, 2008 5:32 AM
What is this (posted by "MICHAELM")--some sort of free advertising?
#4
Posted by MJ Kasprzak in reply to comment from Mark, November 19, 2008 1:51 AM
Spam, but I don't know how to delete it, and it's not worth my time to bring it to MVN's attention. Plus, it makes my article appear to be sparking more discussion! In fact, it helped me get two extra comments besides!
#5
Posted by Mark, November 19, 2008 3:29 AM
MJ--
It looks like the Packers are in the driver's seat in the mediocre NFC North (of course I'm just saying this in hopes that it jinxes them). Seriously, the Vikes have a more difficult schedule than either the Bears or the Packers; the Packers' defense exposed the Bears quarterbacks for the frauds that they are; McCarthy is the best coach in the NFC North (faint praise); the Vikings might be losing three-fourths of their defensive line this week; Aaron Rodgers is the best QB in the NFC North (once again, faint praise). Your description of Gus Frerotte as a backup journeyman quarterback was an accurate one. For awhile there, I was starting to think he was the second coming of Randall Cunningham.
#6
Posted by MJ Kasprzak in reply to comment from Mark, November 19, 2008 3:48 AM
You know, Mark, being nice to me and complimenting my team isn't gonna make me root for yours...LOL!
Seriously, I agree with almost everything you said, except that I think Orton is pretty good, and someone has to be darn good to be the best in this division. After all, imagine what he would do with some receivers--I mean, their guys make yours look like Carter and Moss...well, maybe Carter and Reed. We have four receivers that are all better than Devin Hester, their best guy. (Of course, he doesn't belong in that position--being an athlete doesn't make you a receiver.) And I thought Jackson might have been at least a poor-man's Cunningham: an athletic QB who isn't an accurate enough passer but has a strong arm.
That being said, while I do think we have to be considered the favourites and maybe even the best team in this pathetic division, the Bears probably have a little easier schedule than we do and I would still take the field over us in a bet.














Leave a comment